"We know that some new particles of matter were formed immediately after the Big Bang, but they were gone within a millionth of a second or so," explains Gagliardi.
Gagliardi "knows" this? If something is gone within a millionth of a second, billions of years ago, how do they "know"? All of this is speculation and conjecture.
A question I have had regarding the Big Bang, the entire supposition is premised on everything colliding at or near the speed of light. What was prior to the Big Bang? Are these scientists still going over the Universe expanding and contracting? What about the Universe increasing in speed as it separates, as has been currently obsevered?
Dark Matter cannot explain this, nor can Newton.
Did you read his paper and still not understand?
Or are you dismissing the research out of hand?
Two branes flirting with each other?