Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

From 2-trillion-degree heat, researchers create new matter -- and new questions
Texas A&M University ^ | Mar 4, 2010 | Unknown

Posted on 03/04/2010 11:47:09 AM PST by decimon

A worldwide team of researchers, including 10 from Texas A&M University, have for the first time created a particle that is believed to have been in existence immediately after the creation of the universe – the so-called "Big Bang" – and it could lead to new questions and answers about some of the basic laws of physics because in essence, it creates a new form of matter.

Researchers Carl Gagliardi, Saskia Mioduszewski, Robert Tribble, Matthew Cervantes, Rory Clarke, Martin Codrington, Pibero Djawotho, James Drachenberg, Ahmed Hamed and Liaoyuan Huo, all affiliated with the Texas A&M Cyclotron Institute, along with numerous researchers from universities and labs all over the world, have created the anti-hypertriton – a never-before-seen particle – by colliding gold nuclei at extremely high speeds. Their work is published in the current issue of Science Express.

Using the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) at Brookhaven National Laboratory on Long Island, N.Y., the team used particles of gold and collided them just short of the speed of light (186,000 miles per second). More than 100 million collisions were made to collect the data.

"We know that some new particles of matter were formed immediately after the Big Bang, but they were gone within a millionth of a second or so," explains Gagliardi.

"By accelerating the gold (gold was selected because it is very heavy) at extremely high speeds, we were able to replicate the conditions right after the Big Bang. It's very much like when two cars collide at high speeds – you would have a lot of hot metal.

"At a temperature of about two trillion degrees, which is about 100,000 times hotter than the surface of the sun, we were able to produce a new form of matter."

As this new form of matter evolves, it expands and cools and eventually decays. When it does so, the majority of it converts back into ordinary matter, but a large amount converts into anti-matter instead, Gagliardi points out.

"This enables us to see things we have never seen before," Gagliardi adds.

"We found evidence of particles called anti-lambdas bound within the anti-nuclei. The anti-lambda has a lifetime of less than one-billionth of a second, which on a nuclear time scale, is actually a long amount of time. It gives us a framework to make sort of a 3D periodic table of the elements, from matter to anti-matter. This now gives us a new class of matter to study, one we think should be a mirror image of our world. But a big question is, how accurate is that mirror?"

Gagliardi says it's been known that the Big Bang made equal amounts of matter and anti-matter, but over time, something has tripped the balance for life to exist – there is more matter today than anti-matter.

"So why is this?" he asks.

"We may be able to answer these questions in the future."

Mioduszewski adds, "These new findings give us a large new source of hypernuclei. They provide us with a new way to study the forces that act inside atomic nuclei, and might teach us about the forces that act in the center of the neutron stars.

"This has opened up a very big door for us."

###

About research at Texas A&M University: As one of the world's leading research institutions, Texas A&M is in the vanguard in making significant contributions to the storehouse of knowledge, including that of science and technology. Research conducted at Texas A&M represents an annual investment of more than $582 million, which ranks third nationally for universities without a medical school, and underwrites approximately 3,500 sponsored projects. That research creates new knowledge that provides basic, fundamental and applied contributions resulting in many cases in economic benefits to the state, nation and world.

Contact: Keith Randall, News & Information Services, at (979) 845-4644 or keith-randall@tamu.edu or Carl Gagliardi at (979) 845-1411 or c-gagliardi@tamu.edu

For more news about Texas A&M University, go to http://tamunews.tamu.edu.

Follow us on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/tamutalk.


TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: stringtheory
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: Moonman62
I think it's weirder now than it was 20 some years ago, when I studied it.

And it was really weird then.

21 posted on 03/04/2010 12:19:31 PM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

When I was a physics student, aeons ago, we had a t-shirt printed with Maxwell’s Equations in differential form. “And God said: [Maxwell’s Equations], and there was Light”.


22 posted on 03/04/2010 12:21:54 PM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: decimon

Not to judge physics too harshly, but they always say they are describing how the universe was created, but then only demonstrate theories that show how matter can take different forms under different conditions. The question of how the universe was created would explain how something can be created out of nothing. I know this is beyond their paygrade, but would hope that they would constrain their language to precisely what it is they are discovering or theorizing on; how matter took its position and form within the universe, not how matter was created. No one has any idea how that was accomplished. Some say it was a miracle. I tend to agree.


23 posted on 03/04/2010 12:23:06 PM PST by equalitybeforethelaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

how close was this to an Al Gore (tm) brand Surface Temperature Monitoring Station?


24 posted on 03/04/2010 12:25:28 PM PST by AbeKrieger (Al Gore, green courtesy phone.. paging Mr. Al Gore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anitius Severinus Boethius

This is expensive science with no practical app;ication.


25 posted on 03/04/2010 12:35:33 PM PST by steve8714 (If Lindsay Graham is a conservative, I am not..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
I write the laws


26 posted on 03/04/2010 12:43:17 PM PST by Sgt_Schultze (A half-truth is a complete lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: steve8714

The same reason we shouldn’t have gone to the moon in the 60’s, right? No practical reason, so why do it.

Oh, you mean we ended up finding all sorts of practical applications of the knowledge we obtained?

Nevermind.


27 posted on 03/04/2010 12:47:49 PM PST by Anitius Severinus Boethius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: decimon; Eaker; Squantos; humblegunner

Didn’t you do this experiment in your backyard using grapefruits and shotguns or something?


28 posted on 03/04/2010 12:57:13 PM PST by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anitius Severinus Boethius

There were many practical reasons why we should have gone to the Moon. If the US is to remain pre eminent in space we need an active space exploration program. Think battle stations in space with particle beam weapons. When the first operational battle station comes over the horizon, it better have the stars and stripes on it or the world will be cast into a dark age of at least 10.000 years.


29 posted on 03/04/2010 1:03:19 PM PST by Citizen Tom Paine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Anitius Severinus Boethius

The same reason we shouldn’t have gone to the moon in the 60’s, right? No practical reason, so why do it.

The practical reason for going to the moon was to secure our prieminence in space; or short answer, to command the high ground. The moon landing was mostly for show, but the space program is and always will be to own the commanding heights. Its all about winning wars.


30 posted on 03/04/2010 1:09:31 PM PST by equalitybeforethelaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Anitius Severinus Boethius

Actually there is always a practical reason for manned exploration of whatever frontier there is. The nature of human life demands this.


31 posted on 03/04/2010 1:11:32 PM PST by steve8714 (If Lindsay Graham is a conservative, I am not..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: dearolddad
Does anyone have any idea where all the material that created the big bang come from?

In the beginning...

32 posted on 03/04/2010 1:13:52 PM PST by frithguild (I gave to Joe Wilson the day after, to Scott Brown seven days before and next to JD Hayworth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: decimon; AdmSmith; bvw; callisto; ckilmer; dandelion; ganeshpuri89; gobucks; KevinDavis; ...
the anti-hypertriton – a never-before-seen particle – by colliding gold nuclei at extremely high speeds... Using the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) at Brookhaven National Laboratory on Long Island, N.Y., the team used particles of gold and collided them just short of the speed of light (186,000 miles per second). More than 100 million collisions were made to collect the data.
Yes, that's right -- using a facility right here in the United States, and not some third rate overpriced monster magnet buried under some village in Europe. ;') Thanks decimon. I think this is a repeat topic, but really who's gonna be able to tell? ;')

· String Theory Ping List ·
Cat Physicist
· Join · Bookmark · Topics · Google ·
· View or Post in 'blog · post a topic · subscribe ·


33 posted on 03/04/2010 3:31:51 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Freedom is Priceless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

I thought this was an article about Phoenix in July.


34 posted on 03/04/2010 3:45:38 PM PST by Jeff Chandler (:: The government will do for health care what it did for real estate. ::)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
I think this is a repeat topic...

No, it's not from The Onion.

Onion.

35 posted on 03/04/2010 3:51:08 PM PST by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

wHY did they use gold?


36 posted on 03/04/2010 5:26:00 PM PST by TomasUSMC ( FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard

I remeber that T-shirt! ... Do you recall the one that had a cow standing in clover chewing its cud, thinking of the equation for escape velocity per gram from Earth Gravity.


37 posted on 03/04/2010 6:10:09 PM PST by MHGinTN (Obots, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: TomasUSMC
From the RHIC website:

"RHIC is the first machine in the world capable of colliding heavy ions, which are atoms which have had their outer cloud of electrons removed. RHIC primarily uses ions of gold, one of the heaviest common elements, because its nucleus is densely packed with particles."

I find that explanation somewhat lacking ... I can make some inferences from it, but that's all that they are.

38 posted on 03/05/2010 5:09:50 AM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Michael Barnes

I thought it was the mullet.


39 posted on 03/05/2010 6:15:58 AM PST by bonnieblue4me (You can put lipstick on a donkey (or a dimrat), but it is still an ass!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard

“RHIC is the first machine in the world capable of colliding heavy ions, which are atoms which have had their outer cloud of electrons removed. RHIC primarily uses ions of gold, one of the heaviest common elements, because its nucleus is densely packed with particles.”

I find that explanation somewhat lacking ... I can make some inferences from it, but that’s all that they are.

Thanks. Something is something.


40 posted on 03/05/2010 11:23:24 AM PST by TomasUSMC ( FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson