Posted on 02/24/2010 3:59:44 PM PST by capacommie
There is a dark line that goes up the back of the lady in sandals (second lady from left). Looks cropped.
Also a dark line that goes up the lady’s right arm. Lady with dark dress in center. Also looks cropped.
re: his birthplace. one site they haven’t scrubbed of the Queen’s reference.
http://genealogy.about.com/od/aframertrees/p/barack_obama.htm
the gramps, toot, and barry in central park photo was from Obama For America via Time Magazine.
http://www.time.com/time/photogallery/0,29307,1834628_1754223,00.html
LOL...*You’ve broken my mind*....that is sooooooo perfect!
I have some Zap-A-Gap right here.
Lean over a bit and I’ll glue it back together.
:)
I don’t even wanna know what that means.
;-D
Then he missed this great archive photo of when Barry sang for Gladys Knight as one of the Pips...
That’s funny. Reminds me of happier days, before karaoke bars.
Given when these photos were taken, they were actual photos that were scanned. The scanning will distort a picture, and the further in the past they were scanned, the worse it would be.
You were wrong the first time you posted this (about a year ago?) and you are wrong now. Quit spreading lies.
Things happen like this in photos that the photographer may not be aware of at the time--there may be a tree or light pole in the background that will later appear to be growing up out of someone's head or one of the people in the photo is starting to turn his head and, as often happens, his eyes briefly close or someone in the background is flipping him off.
If the photo had been snapped a second or so earlier when the hand was obscured behind Barry's back, it would be claimed that it was a missing hand. "See? You can see by the angle of the grandfather's arm that his hand should be visible resting on Barry's shoulder. But it's not there! It's not there because it's a faked photo!" The question is why, in an otherwise skillfully done fake, the hand was left floating to attract attention. "Well, it's because they're leaving us a clue!" Uh huh. You know, stuff like that.
I'm sure if there was nothing at all in the photo he could "detect" in this way, he would claim that the alteration of the photo had been done so perfectly that it left no traces. This type of person does to photos what cultists do to Bible passages: they
>claim to see things that aren't there,
>claim that what they should have seen used to be there but was removed for nefarious reasons,
>claim that a portion of what is there (the part that messes with their interpretation) was later added or altered, or
>give unusual interpretations of what is there.
And--gee--they all happen to reinforce that cultist's position that otherwise would be undermined by a plain reading (or viewing in this case) of the passage in question.
The question that does arise is why haven’t any of these people from his elementary and high school years come out with stories about Obama. We have never heard anyone come out and say he was a good friend, or a good team mate or a good student (after all he has been called the smartest President ever)? Apparently through these photos, he has been in company of a lot of people, but why are they all so silent? You would think they would have so many things to say about the Leader of the Free World.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.