Posted on 02/21/2010 1:17:31 PM PST by capacommie
Obama agrees as cosponsor of Senate Resolution 511 that 2 US citizen parents, child born on US soil (military base being a US possession) makes one a natural born citizen.
Being a natural born citizen is a requirement, not a suggestion, of the US Constitution for eligibility for presidency.
With an illegal usurper installed, the Constitution is null and void in essence, and everything done by the illegitimate administration is illegal. The Constitution is a contract binding the nation-states. Every contract, debt, owing, treaty, provision, appointment consequential to it, is null and void.
...including Obamacrypt which they intend to Rahm down America's throats tomorrow, despite the will of the American people.
Claire McCaskill and Barack Obama, both democrats, would never legitimately assist a Republican in becoming president. (Born-British Obama would run for president, McCaskill wanted to become V.P.) It turns out McCain was born in Panama proper, not on a military base. Although no senate resolution alters the Constitution, this bill made it sound as if the senate would recognize McCain as a natural born citizen. McCaskill/Obama wanted McCain as the (R) candidate, or they would not have helped him.
Knowing that McCain was not actually born in a US possession (military base), they could blackmail him to not speak up about Obama's lack of eligibility. On the campaign trail, Bill Clinton got closer to impugning Obama's eligibility than John McCain ever did.
Now Vattel did write about natural born citizens who were born out-of-country but while the parents were in military service, but this would have been a contentious issue at best.
natural born citizens have NO other nation-ties at birth natural born citizens are the consummate "pure Americans" natural born citizens have no more rights AS CITIZENS than do statutory citizens, but being president is not a "right", it is a privilege entailing highly discriminatory criterion for eligibility including age, duration of residency, as well as parentage and place of birth (but not race or ethnicity or religion) natural born citizenship is that state AT BIRTH, and cannot be granted at any point beyond natural born citizenship is the highest national security eligibility criterion |
The stakes are high, control over, destruction of, the Constitution of the USA, and tyranny over its people.
A good question.
A better question: How do we get the Constitution to matter?
{I’m of the opinion that bloodshed is the only way.}
I agree with your opinion.
Sarah, you know he isn’t a man.
Don’t you know by now: the Liberal Messiah is superior to the Constitution, so it must obey Him. </sarc>
Through taking our nation back through the States. We need to make our state legislatures, senates, and governors nullify federal laws through state legislation. Basically, states need to say “beat it” and we need to ignore federal law that states have nullified.
And you say bloodshed is the only option, the most effective way is through state militias and national guard.
“Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizenS on an American military base in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936”
What a bunch or crap. John Sidney McCain, III was born in Colon, the Republic of Panama. He lied in his stupid lying book.
Yes Gatun he did was born in Colon, this was the basis for the McCaskill-Obama blackmail.
I’d settle for the ****bird being from the Christian part of Kenya...
This stupid red herring has been squashed on millions of other threads.
I like “born on Saturn”......
I simply don’t get why nobody has the cojones to pursue this matter - except people who don’t seem to have any power to be effective. Eligibility is the biggest threat to our country that we’ve faced at least in my lifetime and nobody wants to fix it. They just ignore it as though there was nothing that could be done and there are plenty of FACTS already public that show he’s not natural born. If Tony Blair, Sarkozy or Putin tried to run for POTUS there would be an uproar...this empty suit just sailed right in. The GOP should have nailed this in 2008.
1 Certified copy of original birth certificate
2 Columbia University transcripts
3 Columbia thesis paper
4 Campaign donor analysis requested by 7 major watchdog groups
5 Harvard University transcripts
6 Illinois State Senate records
7 Illinois State Senate schedule
8 Law practice client list and billing records/summary
9 Locations and names of all half-siblings and step-mother
10 Medical records (only the one page summary released so far)
11 Occidental College Transcripts
12 Parents marriage Certificate
13 Record of baptism
14 Selective Service registration records
(Did Obama Actually Register for Selective Service?
This supposed revelation of 0's SS records has been debunked here and here.)
15 Schedules for trips outside of the United States before 2007
16 Passport records for all passports
17 Scholarly articles
18 SAT and LSAT test scores
19 Access to his grandmother in Kenya
20 List of all campaign workers that are lobbyists
21 Punahou grade school records
22 Noelani Kindergarten records are oddly missing from the the State of Hawaii Department of Education.
23 Page 11 of Stanley Ann Dunham's divorce decree.
24 Why did Barack Obama resign from the Illinois bar and where are all of the relevant documents?
25 Why did Michelle Obama resign from the Illinois bar after only about four years of practice and where are all of the relevant documents?
Anyone who cares about their country would be very concerned that a POTUS had hidden every scrap of information of his life that he possibly could.
They should have nailed it, but they didn’t and they won’t. People are starting to get itnow ; all the GOP care about is not rocking the boat, staying PC, not being too controversial, and hanging on to their seats in the house and senate. They are no longer the party of conservatism.
Not really.
Why Senator John McCain Cannot be President: Eleven Months and a Hundred Yards Short of Citizenship
>And you say bloodshed is the only option, the most effective way is through state militias and national guard.
Having been a member of the/my State’s National Guard for 9 years I’m unsure about that, far too many people in leadership positions seem [at least to me] to be ‘good old boys’ who are more concerned w/ that politics than, strictly speaking, the Constitution of the US.
For example, in 2008 I made the comment that if Obama wasn’t Constitutionally qualified, and elected [and installed/inaugurated] anyway, that it would be our [soldiers, active-duty and National Guard alike] duty to remove him from office... I got a bit of a talking down to from a senior NCO for it. (Though technically speaking if they’d have tried any sort of punishment, NJP or otherwise, for the statement it may’ve cost them.)
oathkeepers.org
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.