To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The efficiency is probably much lower. Nanosolar is already doing flexible solar arrays, albeit at only 10-15% efficiency, but it’s free energy essentially, and silicon is where most of the money is at in these arrays, along with mounting.
2 posted on
02/16/2010 9:19:00 AM PST by
domenad
(In all things, in all ways, at all times, let honor guide me.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
This could be really cool.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
If it works, it will be profitable. If it's profitable, it will show up at my local Home Dept.
I'll pay attention then.
4 posted on
02/16/2010 9:19:15 AM PST by
ClearCase_guy
(I was born in America, but now I live in Declinistan.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
And then, if they could package these sheets folded like corrugated cardboard stiffeners they could greatly increase the surface area within any given frame or panel size. Think of ordinary cardboard with one of the outer skin sheets peeled off.
7 posted on
02/16/2010 9:24:58 AM PST by
Dumpster Baby
(Truth is called hate by those who hate the truth.)
To: rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; Salo; Bobsat; JosephW; ...
8 posted on
02/16/2010 9:25:26 AM PST by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
So, the photovoltaic cell captures 96% of sunlight and has a lab efficiency of around 17%. I take it it will generate an enormous amount of heat. Any idea what the substrate is and the estimated cost/watt?
Geez, I have lots of questions (lifespan, environmental degradation, scalability, mass production feasibility, etc.).
14 posted on
02/16/2010 9:48:43 AM PST by
Edward Watson
(Fanatics with guns beat liberals with ideas)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
25 posted on
02/16/2010 3:40:26 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(Happy New Year! Freedom is Priceless.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson