[Southack]

And yet, even after all your posts on the subject, the unaided process described by the article still actually does remain “the only explanation.” ... ”An aided process can insert ERVs into the same place as can an unaided process.” Sure they could." - EnderWiggins

You appear to be unable to see the contradiction in your own admissions and claims, but there it is, for one, above in claiming that there is "only one" process that can explain it, and then admitting that yet another process can explain it.

Logic 101 eludes you.

[EnderWiggins]

Your equivocation does not equal my contradiction.

Until such time as somebody comes up with an alternate explanation, it is a simple statement of fact there is only one explanation for the phenomenon.

You certainly have yet to offer one... in spite of how many posts? I’ve lost count. There certainly might be unknown explanations out there somewhere... but none at this point can even be termed “hypothetical.”

Logic 101 you say?

http://www.fallacyfiles.org/equivoqu.html