I read it and the others.
Where did any one but you bring up reading the Bible literally?
Is that the only kind of argument you can win, the strawman you set up and demand others to support?
>>Where did any one but you bring up reading the Bible literally?<<
You need to follow the argument. He says the Bible “says” or “doesn’t say” xxxx. That implies literal interpretation.
My challenge of where it speaks to specific scientific constructs was met with theological answers.
If you say the Bible (or any text) “says” xxxx, you MUST quote it in its original language, else you have no idea what it “says.”
Simple for people who understand logic.
And the argument you are making was not made by him. I am sure he is happy to have you pick up his forensic failure, but if I was him I would be embarrassed by the implication he can’t fight his own fight.
Pretty much, thats one of the main tools out of the evolutionists playbook.