Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Perdogg

Its pretty simple - you are asking thew world to conform to a standard you prefer, which is different than the one that has long been established. For example:

The 1990s decade:

1. 1990
2. 1991
3. 1992
4. 1993
5. 1994
6. 1995
7. 1996
8. 1997
9. 1998
10. 1999

The 2000s decade:

1. 2000
2. 2001
3. 2002
4. 2003
5. 2004
6. 2005
7. 2006
8. 2007
9. 2008
10. 2009


23 posted on 12/26/2009 9:34:18 AM PST by Notwithstanding (Wer glaubt ist nie allein. Who believes is never alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Notwithstanding

what historical events took place in year 0?


28 posted on 12/26/2009 9:47:09 AM PST by Perdogg (Sarah Palin-Jim DeMint 2012 - Liz Cheney for Sec of State - Duncan Hunter SecDef)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Notwithstanding
Its pretty simple - you are asking thew world to conform to a standard you prefer, which is different than the one that has long been established.

You're incorrect. The long-established standard has always been otherwise.

As recently as the late 60s a movie was made called 2001: A Space Odyssey. It was about weird stuff occurring at the beginning of the new millennium.

The Gregorian Calendar lays this stuff out. Disregarding long-established order is for libtards.

35 posted on 12/26/2009 10:03:11 AM PST by Chunga (Any IDIOT who says Obama would be better for the country than McCain is a disgrace - Mark Levin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson