Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Notwithstanding
Its pretty simple - you are asking thew world to conform to a standard you prefer, which is different than the one that has long been established.

You're incorrect. The long-established standard has always been otherwise.

As recently as the late 60s a movie was made called 2001: A Space Odyssey. It was about weird stuff occurring at the beginning of the new millennium.

The Gregorian Calendar lays this stuff out. Disregarding long-established order is for libtards.

35 posted on 12/26/2009 10:03:11 AM PST by Chunga (Any IDIOT who says Obama would be better for the country than McCain is a disgrace - Mark Levin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: Chunga

If the REAL century ended in 1999, and it was simply common wisdom that it was at the end of 2000, we would have had more luck convincing people.

But trying to convince people who wanted a party that they should wait another year was simply more than we could accomplish.

Especially since we had the “Y2K” computer fiasco, which cemented the idea that the transition from 1999 to 2000 was somehow “important”.

Pluse, in 1901 we didn’t have 40 years of mind-numbing public school education making people stupid.


48 posted on 12/26/2009 11:25:41 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson