To: Perdogg
It depends on which decade you are talking about.
If you are talking about “the first decade of the 21st century,” you are correct.
If you are talking about the aughts, you are incorrect.
Are you going to argue that the “1920s” DIDN’T include 1920, and DID include 1930?
14 posted on
12/26/2009 9:14:55 AM PST by
Arthur McGowan
(In Edward Kennedy's America, federal funding of brothels is a right, not a privilege.)
To: Arthur McGowan
yes. The first year has to be year 1 not 0.
19 posted on
12/26/2009 9:22:32 AM PST by
Perdogg
(Sarah Palin-Jim DeMint 2012 - Liz Cheney for Sec of State - Duncan Hunter SecDef)
To: Arthur McGowan
Right. The ‘20s didn’t include 1920. They included 1930.
31 posted on
12/26/2009 9:54:38 AM PST by
Chunga
(Any IDIOT who says Obama would be better for the country than McCain is a disgrace - Mark Levin)
To: Arthur McGowan
Are you going to tell us the 20th century DIDN'T include the year 2000???
2000 was the last year of the 20th century. 2001 was the first year of the 21st century. 2100 will be the last year of the 21st century.
44 posted on
12/26/2009 11:18:41 AM PST by
nobdysfool
(Don't Tread On Me...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson