It’s equally wrong for women to string along a bunch of men and that situation sometimes ends really badly and/or violently.
Call me a religious zealot or a prude if you wish, but my view is that society functions much more effectively when one man settles down with one woman. This goes double when children are involved.
I’m just not into the “playboy” or “playgirl” persona. It is not moral, nor is it normal to dally with anyone who wears a skirt (or pants). I believe it is a sign of mental or emotional weakness.
Exactly right! In this case, we're all going to see the harm this man has caused his family.
Mindy
Many of us have them in our own families, and of course the suffering and pain is enormous.As long as they leave me and mine alone, why feel threatened by them? I hope Tiger gets on with his life and the Mrs. Woods gets on with hers so they can be happy.
I am amazed at the rancor towards Tiger Woods, that he could not live up to their expectations, as if he somehow threatened them personally. Do people live in fear of that conduct in themselves or in their own spouses , so that they must destroy others who are incapable of monogamy? LOL. Its a riot.
Many women on this thread treat every man in society as if they were married to all of them and can dictate views on Tiger Woods conduct, as if they themselves were also married to Tiger Woods. Sign of the busted bubble of internal romantic fantasies all gone awry? What a joke.
And what of liberty? Something which is nurtured by leaving the alone to sort themselves out. The crucify Tiger outpouring is just one more aspect of political correctness tyranny.
I disagree with Tiger Woods conduct, but trying to ruin the man is distinctly un-American.I woul dthink differently if he was an elected official who had a duty to the public trust, to be prptected from black mail and undue influence, etc, Tiger Woods owes the public no such duty.
Move on and leave him and his wife and kids alone.That is liberty.The opposite view is tyranny in the nature of the Scarlet Letter.