Romney's Legacy: Socialized Healthcare

[Diogenesis]

GOP_Lady, you are full of it as usual.

Unlike Huckabee who uses his own name, Romney is a proven
coward hiding behind women to hurt women, and men to hurt
women and a handicapped child.

GOP-traitor Mitt Romney’s and his minions’ “knives” are
fresh with the coppery smell of Gov.Palin’s and her childrens’ blood on them -— and it has continued.

You certainly are bound at the umbilicus to your Master.

[Diogenesis]

GOP_Lady: (Lying RomneyBOT) “You are not a responsible poster on this site.”

YOU have nerve calling anyone else “not responsible” since you have been shown to be a liar.

---

Past BS from "GOP_Lady":

GOP_Lady (RomneyBOT decepticon): "I knew Ronald Reagan, Ronald Reagan was a friend of mine, ... I don’t lie.”

Then backtracking BS from "GOP_Lady":

GOP_Lady ( --wink wink-- saw the event "LIVE". ( you betcha, until caught))
"I have no video. I saw it live. I know what happened. It was a spur of the moment joke."
[215 posted on Friday, April 10, 2009 9:45:34 PM by GOP_Lady ]

(about the Romney's exposure by ABC urging his stormtroops to "promise anything" to win)

---

from January 2008 via the WAYBACK machine ===============

"Indeed, it was a little levity. I saw it on his website."
[27 posted on 01/11/2008 8:46:08 PM PST by GOP_Lady]

---

"I saw the video of it, and it was levity. And I, like Mitt Romney, don’t lie."
[36 posted on Saturday, January 12, 2008 12:10:18 AM by GOP_Lady]

---

"Like I said, I don’t lie. Right after the NH primary the video of it was on the Romney site
when you first entered (and it was fairly lenghty) and it was CLEARLY LEVITY
(I thought nothing of it when I heard it)....I couldn’t find it on ABC News’ site as well.
Look, if this indeed happened, it would be all over the news, especially ABC."
[40 posted on Saturday, January 12, 2008 12:57:27 AM by GOP_Lady ]

[Diogenesis]

"Attacking Gov. Palin worked out real well for us. Let's do it again."

"A political party cannot be all things to all people.
It must represent certain fundamental beliefs
 which must not be compromised to political expediency
or simply to swell its numbers."
--  President Ronald Reagan

"We don't intend to turn the Republican Party
 over to the traitors in the battle just ended.
We will have no more of those candidates who are pledged
 to the same goals as our opposition and who seek our support.
Turning the Party over to the so-called moderates
wouldn’t make any sense at all.""
--  President Ronald Reagan

[Tennessee Nana]

Romney and the legacy he leaves his kids...

It fits...

[CharlesWayneCT]

I think polling was turned off because they didn’t like the results they were getting.

[CharlesWayneCT]

Damn RomneyBots — can’t believe they gave him a national radio show to spout his pro-Rino Romney-love stuff corrupting our political process.

[CharlesWayneCT]

You must not have been around here, or you couldn’t have missed it.

Romney was pro-abortion until recently.

[CharlesWayneCT]

NOW your thread is a joke. :-)

[CharlesWayneCT]

The McCain/Palin ticket was up ++8 to 10 pts. in some polls, days prior to the election.

Still repeating that lie? I've shown you the facts twice now, so there's no excuse other than abject laziness for you to continue -- except of course you haven't shown much desire for the truth, so why should this be any different.

There were only FOUR recognized polls in the entire election cycle that had McCain up by 8 or more points. Three of those were in January, before Obama was even the front-runner, and before Palin was a gleam in conservative's eyes.

That leaves a SINGLE poll which showed McCain up by 8 points. ONE POLL:

USA Today/Gallup 09/05 - 09/07 823 LV 4.0 44 54 McCain +10

So, in your one single sentence, you had THREE lies:

1. up ++8 to 10 points: FALSE: No poll ever had them up 10.
2. in some polls: FALSE; There was only ONE poll.
3. days prior to the election: False; It was 2 full MONTHS before the election.

IF I can find 3 lies in a single sentence of your post (lies that have been pointed out to you multiple times) it should be clear that everything you write should be taken with a grain of salt.

[Diogenesis]

Trying to revise history, RomneyBOT?

McCain and Palin would have won were it not for the
"bloody knives" of Team Romney.

They were up. Then they lost. Team Romney won. Obama won.

[Diogenesis]

[from "Mitt Romney as Tarantino's Superman", New Republic]:
"Whereas most superheroes' secret identities (Bruce Wayne, Peter Parker) are their true identities
--the people they were before their parents were murdered or they were bitten by radioactive spiders
or exposed to gamma rays or what have you--Superman was born Superman.
It's Clark Kent that is the invented alias, the pose, the "costume."
And in the way Superman plays Kent--weak, self-doubting, cowardly--
we can see what he thinks of the human race overall.
It occurred to me that the same is true of Mitt Romney's desperate,
if never terribly persuasive, impersonation of a conservative Republican."

So America, why take the Fake superhero, when you can have a real one save this country?

[Diogenesis]

Poor sport spoiler Romney doing what he does best:

Novak: "Fred Thompson drop-out rumors traced to Romney campaign"

Said Novak: "The rumors were traced in part to Mitt Romney's campaign,
trying to stir up strife between McCain and Thompson."

"Despite outspending his rivals by huge margins throughout the primaries,
(Mitt Romney, Carpetbagger UT,CA,MA,NH,Mexico) lost Iowa, South Carolina, Florida and California.
The only primaries he won were in Michigan, where Dad was governor; LDS states;
and a few states on Super Tuesday in which his California-obsessed rivals
couldn't spare the cash to advertise.
Only John Connolly in 1968 had a worse cash-to-delegates ratio.
And John McCain rightly did not like Romney's tactics during the primaries.
(W)hen (Romney's early leads) started slipping away, he resorted to unfair,
distorted, scorched-earth negative ads, betting that his opponents couldn't
afford to spend enough for the truth to catch up to his charges."
[Romney: A Mistake for McCain, 7/23/2008, Dick Morris]

[CharlesWayneCT]

Not revising history, just teaching it to the ignorant.

Although it’s hardly “history” — it just happened last year.

You should try lying about stuff that happened further in the past, when more people might not know that you are lying.

McCain/Palin were never going to win, and you are delusional if you really believe otherwise.

In fact, after the non-stop left-wing attacks on Palin and her children, that is when the McCain/Palin ticket reached it’s zenith, and when they had their best polling.

But I’ve already explained all this to you, so again I say you are not interested in the truth, and nothing you write should be taken at face value.

Your entire premise is faulty, but your argument also lacks any factual basis.

And by the time Palin had her disastrous national interviews, the ticket was already behind — so those interviews can’t be blamed for their loss anyway.

In fact, it is clear that the problem was John McCain, and his response to the economic meltdown.

[higgmeister]

McCain/Palin were never going to win, and you are delusional if you really believe otherwise.

In fact, after the non-stop left-wing attacks on Palin and her children, that is when the McCain/Palin ticket reached it’s zenith, and when they had their best polling.

But I’ve already explained all this to you, so again I say you are not interested in the truth, and nothing you write should be taken at face value.

Your entire premise is faulty, but your argument also lacks any factual basis.

Dodgy provides facts with researched links, you give your subjective and biased opinion. Think to yourself which viewpoint has more credibility. The truth may be somewhere in between, but that just indicates you have to be the actual liar.

[Finny]

GOP gal, thanks for posting the transcript of Rush's very warm and enthusiastic response to Romney's speech on the importance of religion in America.

I heard the original broadcast, and your posting of the transcript confirms my impression of the time: Rush refrained absolutely from praising Romney's politics. It makes me feel so good that apparently, by all the evidence I've heard, when it comes to Romney's political beliefs, Rush and I share the same opinion. Indeed, Rush indirectly said that Romney was NOT a conservative when he stated, the day after a Republican Primary debate in which Romney took part: "Folks, there was only one conservative on that stage last night, and that candidate was Fred Thompson." I.e., none of the other candidates, including Romney, were what he considered "conservatives."

Praising Romney's eloquent defense of religion in America was just that and only that. Rush's lack of praise of Romney's political ideals has remained conspicuous and, for me, validating.

[Leisler]

"Why don’t we just hate love everyone, then we can all get along?"

[Leisler]

Mitt,nor his sons, nor his father, nor his linage back to when they came to America from England before the civil war, has ever worn a uniform for the United States. That is for the others.

[Leisler]

A lot of state forced socialism has come out of strong church community impulse carried over into, or onto, state mechanisms. Of course one is voluntary, with self selected participants, and the other is non voluntary. But, anything for the children.

Mitt’s Mormonism, it’s racial, cultural and, up until recently, physical isolation, is, I think the foundation of his acceptance/comfort with state socialism.

And it will never leave him. Hence his constant RINOism.

[Leisler]

"Regardless, Romney isn’t in Congress, he isn’t in the White House, and blaming him for bringing on socialism — which has had the US in its grip since FDR — is “Lame”."

Poor Mitt. A victim. A leader! No, he's a victim ....and a leader! Saviour, Harvard double, master of disaster, financial genius...and a victim of the mouth breathing high school dropout Mass legislature. And Huckleberry. And,soon, that woman from Alaska.

[Leisler]

You must be purged!