Replies

To: Godzilla

Why do you consider a discussion of the concept of biblical allegory to be an attempt to “discredit” the bible?

The pi=3 argument is hardly “lame”. It is inarguable (successfully, anyway), and it is but the simplest example to present.

632 posted on 11/28/2009 7:42:29 AM PST by Buck W. (The President of the United States IS named Schickelgruber...)

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 626 | View Replies ]

To: Buck W.; metmom

The pi=3 argument is hardly “lame”. It is inarguable (successfully, anyway), and it is but the simplest example to present.

Sorry, doesn't hold water. It was successfully refuted in the link metmom provided. Seems you prefer to visit skeptic sites for your bible education and proofs. But that has nothing to do with what ever YOU define a Christian to be - funny you are so silent about YOUR definition (crickets)

645 posted on 11/28/2009 8:00:28 AM PST by Godzilla (3-7-77)

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 632 | View Replies ]

To: Buck W.

It is inarguable (successfully, anyway)...

Oh?

And I thought Google® was EVERYONEs friend!

661 posted on 11/28/2009 8:45:29 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 632 | View Replies ]

To: Godzilla; Buck W.; metmom; Elsie

The pi=3 argument is hardly “lame”.

- - - - - - -

Correct in that it is HARDLY lame.