I think we have arrived!!!!
Doing research and found this 2006 item. Felt it is still thought provoking - especially noting it was based on an ECONOMIST's work.
1 posted on
11/14/2009 11:12:04 AM PST by
sodpoodle
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
To: sodpoodle
2 posted on
11/14/2009 11:13:54 AM PST by
GOP Poet
(Obama is an OLYMPIC failure.)
To: sodpoodle
As if people aren’t already choosy about their partners.
3 posted on
11/14/2009 11:15:04 AM PST by
wastedyears
(My 15 seconds of fame are on my profile.)
To: sodpoodle
Aren’t liberals another species ?
4 posted on
11/14/2009 11:15:52 AM PST by
libh8er
To: sodpoodle
Old news.
5 posted on
11/14/2009 11:16:11 AM PST by
Diogenesis
("Those who go below the surface do so at their peril" - Oscar Wilde)
To: sodpoodle
This is so ignorant that I can hardly believe it....
Lol!!!
6 posted on
11/14/2009 11:16:30 AM PST by
SumProVita
(Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
To: sodpoodle
the "underclass" humans who would have evolved into dim-witted, ugly, squat goblin-like creatures. OK, I'll go first: No Helen Thomas pics PLEASE!
7 posted on
11/14/2009 11:17:50 AM PST by
Charles Henrickson
(Me? I'm tall, slim, healthy, attractive, intelligent, and creative.)
To: sodpoodle
“Humanity may split into two sub-species in 100,000 years’ time”
Huh, we already have. Those two subspecies being conservatives and liberals.
One uses their brain and common sense, the other just their brain and a college degree.
8 posted on
11/14/2009 11:17:51 AM PST by
diverteach
(http://www.slapobama.com/)
To: sodpoodle
Oh sheesh! Guess the "scientists" just finished reading H.G. Wells 1898 fiction "The Time Machine"... the future is inhabited by the working-class brute "Morlocks" and the beautiful, tall, "arisctocratic" elite.
9 posted on
11/14/2009 11:18:32 AM PST by
SolidWood
(Sarah Palin: "Only dead fish go with the flow!")
To: sodpoodle
The descendants of the genetic upper class would be tall, slim, healthy, attractive, intelligent, and creative and a far cry from the "underclass" humans who would have evolved into dim-witted, ugly, squat goblin-like creaturesHe's right. Compare, eg, Ann Coulter with Janeane Garofalo.
10 posted on
11/14/2009 11:18:58 AM PST by
hinckley buzzard
(Truth -- to a liberal, what sunrise is to a vampire)
To: sodpoodle
The ‘lower sub-species’ looks like Helen Thomas.
To: sodpoodle
It’s a logical extrapolation of natural selection.
13 posted on
11/14/2009 11:21:45 AM PST by
Burkean
To: sodpoodle
Walmart meets Starbucks?!!??
14 posted on
11/14/2009 11:22:40 AM PST by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, then writes again.)
To: sodpoodle
16 posted on
11/14/2009 11:23:28 AM PST by
UCANSEE2
To: sodpoodle
an expert has said
Who is this "expert"? The theory sounds more like a wet dream he had.
To: sodpoodle
It’s all goning to end in 2012 anyway so why worry
18 posted on
11/14/2009 11:25:01 AM PST by
Popman
To: sodpoodle
The descendants of the genetic upper class would be tall, slim, healthy, attractive, intelligent, and creative and a far cry from the "underclass" humans who would have evolved into dim-witted, ugly, squat goblin-like creatures. Dem wishful thinking *ping*.
The reality is more like this:
And anyway, if they *had* meant the tall, intelligent, etc. to represent themselves, they forgot to notice that abortion is not favored strategy for passing on one's genes.
(Not to mention the Muslim "Demographics is destiny" strategy.)
Cheers!
19 posted on
11/14/2009 11:27:41 AM PST by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: sodpoodle
Haven't you noticed? We already have two species. One is normal people untainted by the poison of the Left; and the Left, Zombies from the Dawn of the Dead.
22 posted on
11/14/2009 11:29:26 AM PST by
jonrick46
(The Obama Administration is a blueprint for Fabian Socialism.)
To: sodpoodle
Has already happened. Normal people and liberals.
Aside from that it’s a dumb idea.
To: sodpoodle
Does he predict climate also?
24 posted on
11/14/2009 11:35:20 AM PST by
devere
To: sodpoodle
People would become choosier about their sexual partners, causing humanity to divide into sub-species, he added. Apparently these 'researchers' watch too much television and don't spend much time out with people who actually date.
25 posted on
11/14/2009 11:40:19 AM PST by
Pan_Yan
(All gray areas are fabrications.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson