Not sure if you're asking this straight or areNot really even interested (as it now appears it may be a 'birther' related issue; we know the guy is unsuitable as a prez, but you need the sheeple exposed (via the MSM) to the stuff beginning with Rev. Wright which even HAnnity and Rus _did_ cover)
Agreed; not really worth Rush’s time without solid corroborating evidence to back up this guy’s claims. Also I think Philip Berg is a bit of a nut and not really worth his time either.
The only small point being the following: If you were a wildly successful radio talk show host with a huge amount of visibility and a massive number of devoted listeners, and you got a call like the one Rush got, would you consider it to be more prudent, professional, honest and admirable to:
1. Tell the caller, “That is not what we are discussing today. You lied about what you were calling about, so goodbye. OK, next caller...”
OR
2. Tell the caller, “Who? Philip Berg and Larry Sinclair? I can’t discuss these people because I’ve never heard of them [even though obviously you clearly have]. I don’t know who they are.”
Keith Olbermann and Chris Matthews both have their own shows and are running them they way they want to. By the logic of your previous post, then, I suppose they are both above any sort of criticism no matter how small, just like Rush, eh?