Skip to comments.
Physicists Calculate Number of Parallel Universes
PhysOrg ^
| 10/16/09
| Lisa Zyga
Posted on 10/18/2009 4:06:14 AM PDT by LibWhacker
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
To: LibWhacker
I totally agree with President Palin’s decision today to ship off the last of the liberals to the detention colonies in Iran and Iraq. What? Oh, I’m sorry, guess I got shoved into the wrong Universe for a while.
2
posted on
10/18/2009 4:16:06 AM PDT
by
AUH2O Repub
( SPalin/Hunter 2012)
To: LibWhacker
Since Prez Zero took over, I feel I’ve slipped through the space time continuum into one of these many parallel universes.
3
posted on
10/18/2009 4:23:26 AM PDT
by
Lawgvr1955
(You can never have too much cowbell !!)
To: AUH2O Repub
I totally agree with President Palins decision today to ship off the last of the liberals to the detention colonies in Iran and Iraq. What? Oh, Im sorry, guess I got shoved into the wrong Universe for a while.
That's ok, I had a few extra minutes before heading off to Washington to attend the inauguration of President Duncan Hunter and Vice President Sarah Palin, and I was especially looking forward to Defense Secretary Peter Pace (General, retired, USMC) expanding upon U.S. plans for 'Operation Communist Eviction' starting with Vietnam, proceeding to North Korea, and on into Red China, utilizing both 'bunker-buster' warheads for underground enemy installations, and nuclear 'ChiCom Disintegrator' warheads for the prime leadership targets in Beijing and outlying areas.
And did you catch last night's 'Dancing with the Czars'? That Putin does a mean fox(bat)trot, ya know? LOL
4
posted on
10/18/2009 4:28:38 AM PDT
by
mkjessup
(If Satan is the father of liars, that pipsqueak 0bama must surely be his sockpuppet.)
To: LibWhacker
This is what happens when you do science by calculation instead of science by observation.
5
posted on
10/18/2009 4:42:05 AM PDT
by
Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
(There are only two REAL conservatives in America - myself, and my chosen Presidential candidate)
To: LibWhacker
What kind of experiments do they use to test this theory?
6
posted on
10/18/2009 4:50:10 AM PDT
by
stevem
In what universe do they come up with the right answer?
7
posted on
10/18/2009 4:52:17 AM PDT
by
vollmond
(I'm an issues voter. If you're a Democrat, I've got issues.)
To: LibWhacker
Forgive me for asking, but if the “universe” consists of all matter, energy, and space that exist, how can there be a “parallel universe”? Wouldn’t it be more accurate to say they believe there are parts of the universe that have not yet been discovered?
8
posted on
10/18/2009 4:53:48 AM PDT
by
deaconjim
(Because He lives...)
To: LibWhacker
These so called scientiests are from a different universe where the human mind determines reality, instead of coping with reality.
9
posted on
10/18/2009 4:56:53 AM PDT
by
DannyTN
To: LibWhacker
Schrödinger's cat Ping
To: LibWhacker
Sometimes when crossing a completely deserted street, I think I might get creamed by a car barreling down it in a parallel universe.
11
posted on
10/18/2009 4:58:10 AM PDT
by
Oratam
To: Oratam
How do you know you weren’t? Parallel speaking that is.
12
posted on
10/18/2009 5:06:19 AM PDT
by
AUH2O Repub
( SPalin/Hunter 2012)
To: vollmond
The Clown Universe; the same one that has a natural born sneak, cheat and lair for President.
13
posted on
10/18/2009 5:07:19 AM PDT
by
ntmxx
(I am not so sure about this misdirection!)
To: Oratam
By an uninsured illegal alein, you know a Mexican without insurance. Not a creature from another planet.
14
posted on
10/18/2009 5:09:44 AM PDT
by
STD
(FReep away both night and day until the truth has had its say!)
To: LibWhacker
In a new study, Stanford physicists Andrei Linde and Vitaly Vanchurin have calculated the number of all possible universes, coming up with an answer of 10^10^16. If that number sounds large, the scientists explain that it would have been even more humongous, except that we observers are limited in our ability to distinguish more universes; otherwise, there could be as many as 10^10^10^7 universes.
There were forty rabbits in the room or no rabbits in the room depending on whether the observer could see or was blind.
15
posted on
10/18/2009 5:11:24 AM PDT
by
aruanan
To: deaconjim
Its nothing more than pure speculation that they think can be proven according to our mathematics. Of course, scientists 50 years from now will laugh at such a notion. Man has a nasty habit of always thinking he knows absolutely everything and no future generations could ever possibly know more than they do right now.
To: deaconjim
Forgive me for asking, but if the universe consists of all matter, energy, and space that exist, how can there be a parallel universe? Wouldnt it be more accurate to say they believe there are parts of the universe that have not yet been discovered
Think of reality as a whole as a colon with diverticulitis. The parallel universes are the diverticula.
17
posted on
10/18/2009 5:18:06 AM PDT
by
aruanan
To: LibWhacker
Interesting in light of Hugh Everett’s original “Many World’s” hypothesis of the ‘50s, that the universe splits off after each quantum possibility is actually realized rather than canceled out in their circumstances.
Interesting too how today’s M-Theory, in its various interpretations, seems to agree overall.
Yet what bearing could this have on God, which many of these “scientists” seem desperate to nullify even as supposedly not admitting their “belief” in Him?
18
posted on
10/18/2009 5:31:10 AM PDT
by
onedoug
To: LibWhacker
And so when do we see the calculation of the number of angels that can dance on the head of a pin?
19
posted on
10/18/2009 5:31:57 AM PDT
by
motor_racer
(What is the color of the boathouse at Hereford?)
To: LibWhacker
10^10^10^7 is a scientific result. Not a very useful one, nor one which can even be described as a bound of any form, but still a nominally scientific result.
10^10^16 is a pseudoscientific result. I’m familiar with the argument behind it, but outside of the fruitcakes in the “quantum consciousness” realm, it is viewed as comedic. The formalism behind it gives rise to numerous internal contradictions within at least three different formulations of quantum mechanics. Their calculation is predicated upon a misapplication of standard quantum theory - evidence of the researchers being educated beyond their intelligence.
Though the fallacy is distinct from these, it reminds me of the argument that nothing exists that is smaller than the maximum resolution the human eye is capable of, or the argument that any process occuring over a timescale too short for human discernment is a process that occurs instantaneously.
20
posted on
10/18/2009 5:33:32 AM PDT
by
M203M4
(Sorry - I lost them *ALL* during a camping trip last week.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson