![]() |
||
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · | ||
I have a couple of his books! Passing them down to future generations. Along with some UFO books from the early days.
parsy, who thinks outside the box but not as far as him
If you want on or off the Electric Universe Ping List, Freepmail me.
But i don't see it happening anytime never.
Earth and Mars do not resemble that in any way, shape, or fashion, and you have to figure that, at least viewed as a collection of rocks, they are older than that. Not hundreds of millions or billions of years old of course, but older than 5K - 10K.
Sagan's super greenhouse theory for explaining the surface temperatures on Venus in particular is patently idiotic and the scientific establish has not done themselves any favors by buying it. The light on the surface of Venus is entirely local; probes see pitch darkness in the middle cloud layers and then light increasing as they approach the surface, that being some combination of electrical discharge and chemical reactions. Again, the claim that such temperatures could be genned by a non-measurable uv flux which cannot re-radiate as IR due to the CO2 cloud layers would be idiotic even without the knowledge that any such sunlight would be a drop in the ocean of the local light sources at the surface.
When those temperatures were first ascertained there should have been a line of scientists five miles long in front of Dr. Velikovsky's door waiting to apologize.
Velikovsky said Venus was the loose cannon in the solar system in ancient times. Donald Patten said it was Mars. They both draw upon ancient history to establish their theory. Which is right?
When Albert Einstein died in 1955, a heavily annotated copy of “Worlds in Collision” was the book found on the table next to his hospital bed.
Velikovsky was a man who believed in what he had found. He is NOT someone to be laughed at.
It all makes sense to me...