Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: agere_contra

I would have wanted to keep it for the historical and collector’s value. I’d have even been willing to loan it out to museums for long term display, but I’d have wanted to retain ownership of it, had I been the property owner.


41 posted on 09/24/2009 6:06:15 AM PDT by TheLurkerX (Even if Darwin was wrong, I say we keep the awards.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: TheLurkerX

Oh me too. Forced sales are always at most a necessary evil.

At least in the case of treasure this old, the Treasure Trove Act enhances the value of finds. 1.5 kg of Gold is worth X money. But 1.5 Kg of Gold + accredited provenance from experts can double the value of the find.

And of course there is a value to the country in preserving the ‘archaeological’ value of these finds - meaning that the treasure gets examined by experts, minutely cataloged and its provenance preserved. And you know the stuff is going to be properly cleaned.

I wish the sales weren’t forced, but I can see the point of the Act.


42 posted on 09/24/2009 6:17:48 AM PDT by agere_contra (NO COUNTRY SHOULD BE FORCED TO ACCEPT THE TYRANNY OF ITS OWN PEOPLE /Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson