I want to tell you something. As a former ethics attorney, I am personally going to refer those gov’t lawyers to their state bar for disciplinary action. Either they are incompetent becaise they have failed to use the unlimited resources of the gov’t to investigate the merits of their case or they are conspiraring with POTUS to obstruct justice by representing someone who they know or should know is outside the scope of his employment. They are not authorized to expend taxpayer’s dollars to represent someone who is outside the scope of his/her employment, i.e., unqualified POTUS. I don’t care what the technical objections may be, if he is not qualified to be POTUS, he is acting outside the scope of his employment. Standing is a technical objection that does not address the scope of employment issue, which is merits based. Before a gov’t attorney can expend effort to represent another government employee, he must conclude that the represented party acted/is acting in the scope of his employment. Why hasn’t the government investigated Obama, and why are they continuing to obstruct justice by throwing up these phoney arguments. Enough already. I am sick and tired of this charade.
You be sure to let us all know how it turns out.
Good night folks!
Thank you for that great info in # 448
:)
Thank you for your clarity.
Please let us know if these
actions breed any response.
Thank You on behalf of all Americans and welcome to FreeRepublic. Keep us posted as to their response ---
Thank you, thank you, thank you! Please keep us informed. I am very interested in following the issue.
I am not attorney but it seems to me that a competent government attorney would have said, “Mr. Obama promptly provide all documentation regarding your natural born status. Stop wasting my time and the taxpayer's money!”
A competent government attorney would have said, “Mr. Obama, if you are not a natural born citizen, you need to find the best private criminal attorney possible, because you are facing prison time.”