OK: Job description says the job of office is “X”. If the person questions that action than the DOJ gets involved.
If person A either does not do “X” because of incompetance, ignorance, bias etc. than they are personally liable and must provide their own counsel.....
If they get the DOJ involved and are found to be at fault than they are abusing the authority of their office.
GET IT?
No, I don’t get your point.
Clinton’s sexual harrassment of Jones took place when he was the Governor of Arkansas not when he was a sitting POTUS. Clearly he was not entitled to DOJ attorneys in that case. Then, the DOJ charged him. Clearly, the government cannot act as prosecution and defense. So, Clinton was entitled to DOJ attorneys. He needed private attorneys.
Whatever accusations Taitz makes against Obama, Clinton, Gates, and Biden are regarding their action or inaction as officers of the executive branch. They’re entitled to DOJ attorneys, for now. Michelle L.R. Obama is listed as a defendant also. She would not be entitled to a DOJ attorney, but she receives the benefit of one since the motion to dismiss affects the whole the case.
There also is no evidence that the DOJ acted at the request of the POTUS or took a specific action at his request. If that turns out to be the case, then the matter should be investigated.