Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: hoosiermama

No, I don’t get your point.

Clinton’s sexual harrassment of Jones took place when he was the Governor of Arkansas not when he was a sitting POTUS. Clearly he was not entitled to DOJ attorneys in that case. Then, the DOJ charged him. Clearly, the government cannot act as prosecution and defense. So, Clinton was entitled to DOJ attorneys. He needed private attorneys.

Whatever accusations Taitz makes against Obama, Clinton, Gates, and Biden are regarding their action or inaction as officers of the executive branch. They’re entitled to DOJ attorneys, for now. Michelle L.R. Obama is listed as a defendant also. She would not be entitled to a DOJ attorney, but she receives the benefit of one since the motion to dismiss affects the whole the case.

There also is no evidence that the DOJ acted at the request of the POTUS or took a specific action at his request. If that turns out to be the case, then the matter should be investigated.


338 posted on 09/07/2009 3:29:25 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Integrity, Character, Leadership, and Loyalty matter - Be an example, no matter the cost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 333 | View Replies ]


To: BuckeyeTexan

Ugh. Harassment.


340 posted on 09/07/2009 3:32:12 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Integrity, Character, Leadership, and Loyalty matter - Be an example, no matter the cost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 338 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Letsd try again. THE DOJ is an attorney for the defence of a government office.....Do you understand that?


345 posted on 09/07/2009 3:41:18 PM PDT by hoosiermama (ONLY DEAD FISH GO WITH THE FLOW.......I am swimming with Sarahcudah! Sarah has read the tealeaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 338 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson