Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MHGinTN
You wrote: "Nothing in that statement/suggestion/comment from a man who would sit on the SCOTUS even addresses parents except in the context of natural born, the ones that would be admitted into the administration of our national government, not the parents. Thus Jay established the contrast between foreigners and those natural born. Thing is, you know that yet are bound by your obamanoid kneed pad servitude to try and spin the obvious into something obscure. You Obama defenders are real devious, but apparently not so smart little nettles."

Right. Nothing about the parents. But YOU are the one saying the parents have to be citizens. The parents could be foreigners!

I detest Obama, so your calling me a supporter of him is another measure of your inability to think clearly. I am not defending anything but clear thinking. You cannot comprehend plain English. Jay is talking about "the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government." A child born of foreigners is not a foreigner: He or she is a natural born citizen. That was the law in the colonies and that was the law in the states after independence was declared.

U.S. Supreme Court

U.S. v. WONG KIM ARK, 169 U.S. 649 (1898)

169 U.S. 649

It thus clearly appears that by the law of England for the last three centuries, beginning before the settlement of this country, and continuing to the present day, aliens, while residing in the dominions possessed by the crown of England, were within the allegiance, the obedience, the faith or loyalty, the protection, the power, and the jurisdiction of the English sovereign; and therefore every child born in England of alien parents was a natural-born subject, unless the child of an ambassador or other diplomatic agent of a foreign state, or of an alien enemy in hostile occupation of the place where the child was born.

III. The same rule was in force in all the English colonies upon this continent down to the time of the Declaration of Independence, and in the United States afterwards, and continued to prevail under the constitution as originally established.

306 posted on 08/28/2009 7:34:36 PM PDT by Technical Editor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies ]


To: All

I hereby give up on getting through to you. If you cannot respond to reason, and continue to deny facts that are as plain as day, there’s not much more I can say to you.


307 posted on 08/28/2009 7:39:20 PM PDT by Technical Editor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 306 | View Replies ]

To: Technical Editor

No, bless your little heart, it is the foreigners who will ‘not be allowed into’ ... you’re the fool trying to play double talk and focus upon the foreign parents. BTW, fool, naturalized parents are foreign born, yet if a person is born of naturalized parents byt he time of their birth, they are considered natural born by jus sanguine.


309 posted on 08/28/2009 7:44:48 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 306 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson