Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Technical Editor

No, bless your little heart, it is the foreigners who will ‘not be allowed into’ ... you’re the fool trying to play double talk and focus upon the foreign parents. BTW, fool, naturalized parents are foreign born, yet if a person is born of naturalized parents byt he time of their birth, they are considered natural born by jus sanguine.


309 posted on 08/28/2009 7:44:48 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 306 | View Replies ]


To: MHGinTN

The following is the holding of the U.S. Supreme Court. There is no clearer statement of the issue of who is natural born than this.

U.S. Supreme Court
U.S. v. WONG KIM ARK, 169 U.S. 649 (1898)

“It thus clearly appears that by the law of England for the last three centuries, beginning before the settlement of this country, and continuing to the present day, aliens, while residing in the dominions possessed by the crown of England, were within the allegiance, the obedience, the faith or loyalty, the protection, the power, and the jurisdiction of the English sovereign; and therefore every child born in England of alien parents was a natural-born subject, unless the child of an ambassador or other diplomatic agent of a foreign state, or of an alien enemy in hostile occupation of the place where the child was born.

“III. The same rule was in force in all the English colonies upon this continent down to the time of the Declaration of Independence, and in the United States afterwards, and continued to prevail under the constitution as originally established.”


311 posted on 08/28/2009 7:57:13 PM PDT by Technical Editor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson