Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: allmendream

see US vs Wong Kim Ark

please show me where in that case it discusses Natural Born Citizen.


266 posted on 08/27/2009 1:28:11 PM PDT by rolling_stone (no more bailouts, the taxpayers are out of money!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies ]


To: rolling_stone
From U.S. vs Wong Kim Ark....

Every citizen or subject of another country, while domiciled here, is within the allegiance and the protection, and consequently subject to the jurisdiction, of the United States. His allegiance to the United States is direct and immediate, and although but local and temporary, continuing only so long as he remains within our territory, is yet, in the words of Lord Coke, in Calvin’s Case, 7 Rep. 6a, “strong enough to make a natural subject, for if he hath issue here, that issue is a natural-born subject;” and his child, as said by Mr. Binney in his essay before quoted, “if born in the country, is as much a citizen as the natural-born child of a citizen, and by operation of the same principle.”

Relevant quotes excerpted and with parenthetical remarks....

“for if he (0bama Sr. in the case under discussion) hath issue (a child for those of you in Rio Linda) here, that issue (Barrack Hussein Obama) is a natural born subject”.

268 posted on 08/27/2009 1:35:41 PM PDT by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed, so how could it be redistributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson