Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

If Obama's father was a Kenyan then how could Hussein be eligible to be POTUS?
8/26/2009 | Kellynla

Posted on 08/26/2009 12:40:24 PM PDT by kellynla

If Obama's father was a Kenyan then how could Hussein be eligible to be POTUS?


TOPICS: Conspiracy; History; Reference
KEYWORDS: article2section; bc; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; colb; kenyan; obama; obamafamily; potus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 341-344 next last
To: Technical Editor
Nobody in Congress seems to have a question about his eligibility, possibly because they think it unlikely the State of Hawaii is participating in a scam.

So then the Congress should have no objection to an SR511 for Obama, right???? Where is it????

221 posted on 08/27/2009 9:26:27 AM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: Drew68
My childern are Natural Born Citizens.

of the Obama variety, no doubt, right.

222 posted on 08/27/2009 9:27:40 AM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: Technical Editor
They can’t, and when you or I or anyone else tells them that, they pretend they cannot hear. They cannot face the reality that there is absolutely no basis for the myth they have believed all their lives invented shortly after Obama won the election.

Fixed it for you.

223 posted on 08/27/2009 9:34:19 AM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: Technical Editor

“There is nothing in U.S. law that says that dual citizenship has ANY EFFECT at all on one’s U.S. citizenship.”

In my post, I was making the assumption that Barack Hussein Obama Jr. was born as either a U.S. or a British (via Kenya) citizen, it hadn’t even occurred to me that he may have entered the world as both, so you raise an interesting point. This just gives the Supreme Court even more wiggle room to rule in favor of Obama should a case on the question of his citizenship ever reach their docket.


224 posted on 08/27/2009 9:36:34 AM PDT by Texan Tory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: Technical Editor
So you think someone who is a “citizen at birth” is an alien? You know that makes no sense. How can you defend such an irrational and ludicrous position?,br>
Twisting words again? Like I said before,NATURAL BORN CITIZEN is a UNIQUE requirement the Founders put in. Get that? UNIQUE! which means, one-of-a-kind. No other elected position in our Republic has such an eligibility requirement.
225 posted on 08/27/2009 9:39:11 AM PDT by thecraw (Christian by choice, American by the grace of God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

He can’t be. He is ineligible to be POTUS as a number of us have been saying since long before the Election.


226 posted on 08/27/2009 9:41:34 AM PDT by Danae (- Conservative does not equal Republican. Conservative does not compromise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Technical Editor

No it doesn’t


227 posted on 08/27/2009 9:43:36 AM PDT by Danae (- Conservative does not equal Republican. Conservative does not compromise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip
McCain was born in Panama which was a US territory at the time

Unless McCain is a lot older than reported, no. Panama has been an independent nation since 1903.

228 posted on 08/27/2009 10:14:28 AM PDT by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: Danae

“No it doesn’t”
***
I have no idea what you’re responding to, so your post is meaningless to me...


229 posted on 08/27/2009 10:24:30 AM PDT by Technical Editor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: thecraw

“Twisting words again? Like I said before,NATURAL BORN CITIZEN is a UNIQUE requirement the Founders put in. Get that? UNIQUE! which means, one-of-a-kind. No other elected position in our Republic has such an eligibility requirement.”

***

That’s true. The president has to be a citizen from the moment of birth. A senator can be naturalized.


230 posted on 08/27/2009 10:25:38 AM PDT by Technical Editor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

“They can’t, and when you or I or anyone else tells them that, they pretend they cannot hear. They cannot face the reality that there is absolutely no basis for the myth they have believed all their lives invented shortly after Obama won the election.
Fixed it for you.”

****

You fixed nothing. YOU may have begun to pay attention after Obama won the election, but the Supreme Court decisions have been around for more than 100 years.


231 posted on 08/27/2009 10:32:02 AM PDT by Technical Editor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: Texan Tory

“In my post, I was making the assumption that Barack Hussein Obama Jr. was born as either a U.S. or a British (via Kenya) citizen, it hadn’t even occurred to me that he may have entered the world as both, so you raise an interesting point. This just gives the Supreme Court even more wiggle room to rule in favor of Obama should a case on the question of his citizenship ever reach their docket.”

***
Right. He was both at birth. I don’t think wiggle room is needed. If you’re natural born, that is, a citizen at birth, nothing can take that away from you except your specific request to give it up. Hundreds of natural born Americans are also citizens of the nations in which they were born—people born of at least one U.S. citizen parent in a location outside the United States.


232 posted on 08/27/2009 10:36:10 AM PDT by Technical Editor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: ReignOfError

Thank You — I stand corrected.


233 posted on 08/27/2009 10:51:56 AM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: Technical Editor
You fixed nothing. YOU may have begun to pay attention after Obama won the election, but the Supreme Court decisions have been around for more than 100 years.

Woah, I guess I shoulda used the < /s> tag!

Read some of my other posts on the subject. I'm not one who's buying into this crackpot Birther nonsense, least of all this "NBC=2 US citizen parents" bunkum that Donofrio is peddling.

234 posted on 08/27/2009 10:52:00 AM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: Technical Editor

You’ve done a pretty good job here of arguing your points, and it seems to me that you’ve argued your points on the merits alone, but I can’t help but be curious as to your political perspective (conservative, liberal, pro-Obama, anti-Obama etc.). After spending a fair amount of time looking into this, I have come to the same conclusion as you, I think Obama really is a natural born citizen of the United States, and that efforts to challenge him on his citizenship will be fruitless. I think the energy of those who oppose him could be channeled more effectively by challenging him on his ideas and policies. That’s the approach I favor anyway.


235 posted on 08/27/2009 11:13:05 AM PDT by Texan Tory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: Technical Editor
“Twisting words again? Like I said before,NATURAL BORN CITIZEN is a UNIQUE requirement the Founders put in. Get that? UNIQUE! which means, one-of-a-kind. No other elected position in our Republic has such an eligibility requirement.” *** That’s true. The president has to be a citizen from the moment of birth. A senator can be naturalized.

So with your logic, an illegal alien 9 months pregnant can slip across the border into El Paso, have a baby, head back into Mexico and (assuming that baby can later prove 14 years US residency) that baby would then be eligible for POTUS in 35 years ??? I GUARANTEE you that scenario does NOT fit in with the original intent of the Founding Fathers.

I'll bet you're still wringing your hands over the 2000 election too...
236 posted on 08/27/2009 11:15:38 AM PDT by thecraw (Christian by choice, American by the grace of God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: Technical Editor

That is wholly incorrect. The class of person you are referring to are naturalized at birth, they are not natural-born citizens.

Hope this helps.


237 posted on 08/27/2009 11:37:55 AM PDT by Plummz (pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: Technical Editor
I never said they lied but then they do claim Sun Yat Sen was born there. They haven't disclosed the entire truth. There are major questions about precisely where on the island he was born since one can't be born in two hospitals at the same time, if the parents were married, if there was an attending physician/midwife or if the birth witnessed outside the family, if it was a delayed registration, if a whole lot of other things. The bc is just the tip of the iceberg. The bc is the starting point. The bc is just one of dozens of cards in his very shaky house of cards. When he brings out the long form and shows his original passports and opens his college records and gives a reason for the dozens of social security numbers, and etc., I'll admit you were right all along but right now things smell very fishy.
238 posted on 08/27/2009 11:44:13 AM PDT by bgill (The evidence simply does not support the official position of the Obama administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: Plummz

That is wholly incorrect. The class of person you are referring to are naturalized at birth, they are not natural-born citizens.

Hope this helps.

***

An assertion without anything to back it up (law, SCOTUS decision) helps nobody. Truth isn’t established by making assertions without evidence to support them.


239 posted on 08/27/2009 11:45:17 AM PDT by Technical Editor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: thecraw

So with your logic, an illegal alien 9 months pregnant can slip across the border into El Paso, have a baby, head back into Mexico and (assuming that baby can later prove 14 years US residency) that baby would then be eligible for POTUS in 35 years ??? I GUARANTEE you that scenario does NOT fit in with the original intent of the Founding Fathers.

I’ll bet you’re still wringing your hands over the 2000 election too...

***

That is the law today, yes.

I despise everything Obama stands for. I am a conservative, conservative Republican and I love Dick Cheney with a passion.


240 posted on 08/27/2009 11:47:24 AM PDT by Technical Editor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 341-344 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson