Skip to comments.
Study: Global warming sparked by ancient farming methods
cnn.com ^
| August 18, 2009
| Shelby Lin Erdman
Posted on 08/19/2009 3:13:18 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
To: Free ThinkerNY
2
posted on
08/19/2009 3:15:37 PM PDT
by
cranked
To: Free ThinkerNY
"could have permanently altered"
No such thing.
3
posted on
08/19/2009 3:19:17 PM PDT
by
rednesss
(fascism is the union,marriage,merger or fusion of corporate economic power with governmental power)
To: Free ThinkerNY
Has the whole world gone slap crazy?
4
posted on
08/19/2009 3:25:50 PM PDT
by
abclily
To: Free ThinkerNY
Well, global cooling is happening now bcause of the invention of air conditioning.
We are actually cooling our planet down with all the cool air.
This from a study done in the Voternary62Livingroom set at 70 comfy degrees talking with friends in Michigan who have not had a hot summer but are fearful of rat infested Michigan Parks.
5
posted on
08/19/2009 3:27:23 PM PDT
by
Voter62vb
To: Free ThinkerNY
More poop for unfertile minds.
6
posted on
08/19/2009 3:29:29 PM PDT
by
pallis
To: Free ThinkerNY
I’d love to say it don’t get any dumber than this but, everytime I think that, the left finds a way to come up with something dumber!!!
7
posted on
08/19/2009 3:30:46 PM PDT
by
DustyMoment
(FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
To: Free ThinkerNY
GLOBAL WARMING ... So simple a caveman can do it!
To: Free ThinkerNY
I have a confession, I started it with my smokey barbecue.
To: DustyMoment
I hear the next big fake crisis is going to be an oxygen shortage.
10
posted on
08/19/2009 3:47:42 PM PDT
by
abclily
To: Free ThinkerNY
More laughable nonsense paid for by we taxpayers.
To: Free ThinkerNY
What nonsense!
As any child knows, Global Warming was caused by George Bush! The data on this is quite clear.
Now, if you will excuse me, I have to clear my waterfront property of the dead polar bear carcasses before the stench aggravates my environmentally sensitive neighbors.
I plan on hitching my Prius to them and towing them over to some Republican's house.
12
posted on
08/19/2009 4:01:11 PM PDT
by
Kenny Bunk
(Congratulations Obama Voters! You are not prejudiced. Unpatriotic, maybe. Dumb definitely.)
To: 75thOVI; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aragorn; aristotleman; Avoiding_Sulla; BBell; ...
13
posted on
08/19/2009 4:05:23 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
To: StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 1ofmanyfree; 21twelve; 24Karet; 2ndDivisionVet; 31R1O; ...
14
posted on
08/19/2009 4:05:35 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
To: SunkenCiv
"It seems like a common-sense idea that there weren't enough people around 5, 6, 7,000 years ago to have any significant impact on climate. But if you allow for the fact that those people, person by person, had something like 10 times as much of an effect or cleared 10 times as much land as people do today on average, that bumps up the effect of those earlier farmers considerably, and it does make them a factor in contributing to the rise of greenhouse gasses,"This person is smoking the high grade stuff.
15
posted on
08/19/2009 4:11:50 PM PDT
by
rdl6989
To: Free ThinkerNY
This just hurts my brain.
Are there no straws the Global Warming crowd are not willing to draw?
16
posted on
08/19/2009 4:15:00 PM PDT
by
roaddog727
(Onward into the Breach, and Faciendum est!)
To: Free ThinkerNY
may; could have; according to; possibly; It seems
17
posted on
08/19/2009 4:44:41 PM PDT
by
metesky
(My retirement fund is holding steady @ $.05 a can.)
To: Free ThinkerNY
They never suggest early man using fire as a weapon against competing tribes back then, like we did during WWII. That might have been a more common reason for setting fires.
18
posted on
08/19/2009 4:46:21 PM PDT
by
Reeses
(The fundamental obsession of leftists is size envy.)
To: Free ThinkerNY
Wait a minute! Don’t trees produce CO2, and isn’t CO2 a “greenhouse” gas? If so, it seems that cutting down trees would be a good thing.....
19
posted on
08/19/2009 4:55:42 PM PDT
by
SuzyQue
(Remember to think.)
To: SunkenCiv
"It seems like a common-sense idea that there weren't enough people around 5, 6, 7,000 years ago to have any significant impact on climate. But if you allow for the fact that those people, person by person, had something like 10 times as much of an effect or cleared 10 times as much land as people do today on average, that bumps up the effect of those earlier farmers considerablyWorks both ways.
Without air tankers, fire engines, Hot Shot crews, chainsaws, STEEL tools...and the pulaski had yet to be invented... they didn't even try to put a dent in natural fires, which could burn for months. And such fires had burned regularly, since the beginnings of dry land vegetation and the invention of lightening.
What ever burning they added, also subracted from acreage available for natural burns.
Oh, well; like all other "unnatural man made events", since these types seem to believe that Man is not a part of nature, natural fires are great; man made fires bad, as in "beaver dam good; stock pond evil".
20
posted on
08/19/2009 5:40:44 PM PDT
by
ApplegateRanch
(The mob got President Barabbas; America got shafted)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson