Maybe you should have stayed off the thread and kept reading about red herrings & such. But putting in the capital letters was a nice touch. Show me where I said it was an “almost forgery”. I didn’t. So when you write FWIW, For What It’s Worth is ZERO.
Kevmo, you might have noticed my post was not for your eyes only. It was a response to other things I had seen reading through the thread. Specifically:
>Fred:
“And finally, Polarik gave his opinion. OPINION! He wrote exactly what I was thinking. Polarik did not say he had done an analysis, he reacted.”
He clearly DID say he had done an analysis, so that was just wrong.
>Fred:
“From my point of view, you came close to presenting a forgery in my mind.”
Almost a forgery?
It wasn’t a forgery. Polarik claimed it was. “And a bad one at that.”
From an expert?
What could possibly be the defense for that?