Kevmo, you might have noticed my post was not for your eyes only. It was a response to other things I had seen reading through the thread. Specifically:
>Fred:
“And finally, Polarik gave his opinion. OPINION! He wrote exactly what I was thinking. Polarik did not say he had done an analysis, he reacted.”
He clearly DID say he had done an analysis, so that was just wrong.
>Fred:
“From my point of view, you came close to presenting a forgery in my mind.”
Almost a forgery?
It wasn’t a forgery. Polarik claimed it was. “And a bad one at that.”
From an expert?
What could possibly be the defense for that?
Feel free to ping the people you actually want to respond to your ping. Geez, how lazy can a freeper get?