Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Brytani
“We have a requirement within the Constitution requiring that a candidate for President and VP must meet the criteria of NBC yet we have no system in place nor an overseeing body whose job is is to verify a candidate meets the constitutional standard.”

That is true. However we do have the process in place by which each candidate must sign a document along with Party leaders that they swear the candidate is constitutionally qualified to run for the office.

Every Secretary of State received such documents from Nancy and Obama. :)

158 posted on 07/30/2009 11:25:17 AM PDT by seekthetruth ("See You In DC From 9/11 - 9/13 At Our National Freeper Tea Party Convention!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]


To: seekthetruth; MissTickly; All

Dirty hands shall reap the whirlwind ..

171 posted on 07/30/2009 12:31:05 PM PDT by STARWISE (The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]

To: seekthetruth; Danae; penelopesire; television is just wrong; jcsjcm; BP2; Pablo Mac; ...
HOLD THE PHONE!

I posted that DNC doc yesterday on this thread - post #19.

After I did, I did another search and found ANOTHER one on Count Us Out, and I saved that because it was cleaner and clearer and not smudgy. Initially, the first version showed an overwrite of the N in Nancy .. and I thought it looked like it was started with a faulty pen and then written over.

I was just going to delete the first smudgy version and keep the 2nd one in my image account. THEN I READ THEM BOTH!

***THE LANGUAGE HAS BEEN CHANGED IN THE 2ND VERSION. I've had the first one for awhile, have no clue where I found it. This is the money clause:

".... the following were duly nominated as candidates for said Party as President and Vice President of the United States respectively and the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution."

The Cleaner, 2nd Version

".... the following were nominated as candidates of said Party for President and Vice President of the United States respectively."

What's that all about ?? Pelosi re-thought her liability in the language of the first version and altered the text?

173 posted on 07/30/2009 12:53:13 PM PDT by STARWISE (The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]

To: seekthetruth

Yes we do and we know Obama signed 50 (or was it 57) of them and Madam Pelosi signed a number of them herself.

Some of the election certificates do state that the person is acknowledging that they are eligible under the constitution.

Here’s the catch, we can’t go against Obama or Pelosi for fraud until it’s proven Obama was and knew he was ineligible.

Given the obvious fact that no judge in this country has the cajones to force this case to discovery or to even allow it to fester in the court system, we’re in a catch-22.


237 posted on 07/30/2009 3:31:15 PM PDT by Brytani (DC Freeper Convention and National Tea Party - FreepMail Me for rooms and convention info!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson