Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Tax-chick
I am just totally impressed with what they did with the technology they had! Simpler planes, yes they could mass-manufacture on a scale unimaginable today. And yes, they're far from B-52 technology (almost as old) where, as somebody put it, "they're all fuel and bombs."

But you look at all the handwork necessary, the huge number of tiny (aluminum?) rivets holding it all together, the lightness of the frame and yet... it was (properly) known as the "Flying Fortress" because these planes kept coming home even in terrible condition -- more so than their more capable successors.

One shock was the radio on the plane. I used to have one at least much like it if not identical, until my mother tossed it in the early 70s along with the steamer trunk full of vacuum tubes.

980 posted on 08/20/2009 6:22:16 PM PDT by sionnsar (IranAzadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5:SONY|Remember Neda Agha-Soltan|TV--it's NOT news you can trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 977 | View Replies ]


To: sionnsar

Old planes were much more “airworthy” than modern ones, less dependent on the power of the engine to keep them aloft.


981 posted on 08/20/2009 6:43:59 PM PDT by Tax-chick (If you've ever discovered your cow eating a guest in the barn, you'll understand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 980 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson