I still was unable to find it. I found the discussion here. I I wanted to see the actual court papers that I assume only Berg has.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2112521/posts?page=57
I’m still trying to make head/tail of it:
“Barack Obama and the DNC failed to respond to Bergs filing of Sep. 15 within the required 30 days, which means they ADMITTED to all the charges in the filing by default. When they did not respond in any manner to any of the requests for information or documention the judge extended their deadline, and they then filed a motion for DISMISSAL and for a PROTECTIVE ORDER.
Their reasoning for requesting a protective order is that revealing the information (birth certificate, passports, citizenship in other countries) would cause a defined and serious injury to Obama and/or the DNC. They say revealing these documents raises a legitimate privacy concern and the above mentioned risk that particularly serious embarrassment will result from turning over the requested documentation. (emphasis added) Then they claim Berg has no standing to ask for it.”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2112521/posts?page=57
Seems clear enough on the surface, I guess it’s the PROTECTIVE ORDER we need to see.
see what you can find here:
http://dockets.justia.com/docket/court-paedce/case_no-2:2008cv04083/case_id-281573/