Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: mojitojoe

I’m still trying to make head/tail of it:

“Barack Obama and the DNC failed to respond to Berg’s filing of Sep. 15 within the required 30 days, which means they ADMITTED to all the charges in the filing by default. When they did not respond in any manner to any of the requests for information or documention the judge extended their deadline, and they then filed a motion for DISMISSAL and for a PROTECTIVE ORDER.

Their reasoning for requesting a protective order is that revealing the information (birth certificate, passports, citizenship in other countries) would “cause a defined and serious injury” to Obama and/or the DNC. They say revealing these documents raises a “legitimate privacy concern” and the above mentioned risk that “particularly serious embarrassment will result from turning over the requested documentation.” (emphasis added) Then they claim Berg has no standing to ask for it.”

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2112521/posts?page=57

Seems clear enough on the surface, I guess it’s the PROTECTIVE ORDER we need to see.


175 posted on 07/16/2009 5:19:23 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]


To: Fred Nerks

I guess it’s the PROTECTIVE ORDER we need to see.
____________
YES!!!!!!!!!!!! We do. Any chance we see it?


177 posted on 07/16/2009 5:22:45 PM PDT by mojitojoe (All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson