Now that's a sneaky and slimely way of mooting the lawsuit, and avoiding providing a $12.50 document, (It's probably free if the court would order the state of Hawaii's Registrar to provide the document).
If this is confirmed, then one has to suspect the "order" to cancel the orders came from on high, very high, and most likely verbally, with nothing written down. Of course the people who actually issued and then revoked the orders would know who directed that they be revoked.
Who's got the popcorn?
“Now that’s a sneaky and slimely way of mooting the lawsuit, and avoiding providing a $12.50 document, (It’s probably free if the court would order the state of Hawaii’s Registrar to provide the document).
If this is confirmed, then one has to suspect the “order” to cancel the orders came from on high, very high, and most likely verbally, with nothing written down. Of course the people who actually issued and then revoked the orders would know who directed that they be revoked. “
++++++++++++++
No doubt, and if your theory is true, and it well could be, just another proof in the pudding that zero is desperate to hide his BC...wow!
I’ve been toying with the idea that maybe he had another father, or some other such explanation, something embarassing, but now I’m wondering anew what the heck he would be hiding, if Cook’s orders were indeed revoked..