Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Irish Eyes
She probably had them for the same reason 99% of women who have them do: To make her breasts look larger. If she had them for medical reasons, such as reconstructive surgery due to a mastectomy, that is another story. I saw nothing in the article that led me to believe that was the case, and if it is not the case I stand by my statement.

Cosmetic surgery, done just to enhance looks, is a total waste of money and a mutilation of the body on par with sticking rings through the nose, lips or any other part of the body,IMO(or "changing sexes" for that matter). Any infections, bursting or other defects caused by such surgery are brought on by the people who insist on having such things done to themselves.

I don't include people who have suffered severe trauma from one source or another, including fires and car, plane, train and other vehicle accidents, wars and natural diasters.

55 posted on 07/02/2009 11:54:42 PM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: calex59
If she had them for medical reasons, such as reconstructive surgery due to a mastectomy, that is another story. I saw nothing in the article that led me to believe that was the case, and if it is not the case I stand by my statement. .............................................................

I don't include people who have suffered severe trauma from one source or another, including fires and car, plane, train and other vehicle accidents, wars and natural diasters.

Glad to see the exceptions you made. I just thought that your first statement was pretty sweeping.

56 posted on 07/03/2009 12:07:47 AM PDT by Irish Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson