You are right. I assumed YOU wrote what you meant and that you try to tell the truth as you know it. Now I know I was in error. You do not write what you mean, ergo no one can rely on what you write. You do not tell the truth. That is the bottom line.
If all you agreed to was "cleverness of the pricing scheme," don't cut-and-paste two paragraphs of conclusions and merely state "I agree with that" unless that is exactly what you mean. If it isn't, isolate what you agree with, paste it, and there is no obfuscation of what you agree to.
You display your ignorance in every reply you post.
And you are showing yourself for being the Mac iDiot that you are. Ok now I have to answer to you because I didn’t agree with him 100% but made a general statement that I agree with him. You are a piece of work. If you can’t grasp this concept then I can’t continue to waste my precious time talking to you. It’s like with President Bush I suspported him and I voted for him and I can say I agreed with him as him being our president. Did I like the fact he didn’t give the border agents a full pardon? NO. Did I like his caving in with the Stimulus bill? NO. If you can’t see the same reasoning with me agreeing with Ed Bott’s summation without saying I agree with his opinion about Apple wanting Microsoft to cut prices then you are not only an idiot, you are a troll.