Really? How so. I'm dying to see what MSM dreck you've been reading that leads you to such a foolhardy conclusion.
Yes. Really. Have studied such things since 1965 when I had to in my university library job as acting director of the Special Collections Dept.
Righhhhht. I'm sooooooo impressed with your demonstrated eagerness to ferret out the truth in such matters. /s
MSM--NOPE--NOT FROM THE MSM, AT ALL. The MSM have hidden such things for many decades.
Dreck--flattery will not likely win you points with me.
Foolhardy? I've been predicting where we are now with OThuga and where we are still headed at a faster and faster clip when it was dangerous on FR to speak such facts and truth. At least now, MANY MORE FREEPERS ARE AWAKE. You might consider it. It's a much more survivable state than sleep walking or the walking dead mode.
Hey, I’m all about finding out the truth. But I think your approach to it here is superficial at best.
You posted a laundry list of people who refer to the “new world order” without the least conception of what those people actually meant when they said it. How is a socialist’s idea of a “new world order” the same as a Christian’s or a Pontiff’s? A pope’s new order is one without Communism, and a Communist’s new order is one without the pope. And yet to you it’s all one huge conspiracy that—somehow—everybody’s gonna magically fall in line.
I’m glad you studied all this for so long. Now I’m asking you to take the evidence out of your head and put it on the table. What *specifically* makes you so sure that the Vatican will fold like a cheap camera to the civil powers when it has made a veritable pastime of not doing so in...oh....1789, 1848, 1917, 1939, etc. etc.