Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Still Thinking
Please don't misunderstand, I think this is a terrible idea, I just didn't see any avenues by which this would lead to litigation.

I do think that there may be a business case to do this. Say for example all I want out of life is for some PC to function as a server. Just host a bunch of web pages, maybe provide access or limited access depending upon 'rights' of various users - purchasing the full WinXP, Vista or Win7 would be overkill.

It all depends upon the wisdom of MSFT in picking and choosing - and this wisdom is not what one would expect from a company in a leadership position such as MSFT.

43 posted on 05/20/2009 10:58:08 AM PDT by Hodar (Who needs laws .... when this "feels" so right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: Hodar

Well, sure, I have no problem with selling different products with different capabilities to meet the need. I do get a little leery of a SINGLE software package that has various feature sets that get turned on and off, when that software is written by Microsoft, and the gatekeeper software that decides what level you’ve paid Microsoft for and no doubt wants to verify that decision, is written by Microsoft. Between incompetence and the fact that their paycheck depends on how much functionality this app lets you use, that sounds like a recipe for disaster.


44 posted on 05/20/2009 11:06:17 AM PDT by Still Thinking (If ignorance is bliss, liberals must be ecstatic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson