1 posted on
04/27/2009 12:33:23 PM PDT by
decimon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: SunkenCiv
2 posted on
04/27/2009 12:34:08 PM PDT by
decimon
To: decimon
WHAT! You mean my college perfesser lied to me!
3 posted on
04/27/2009 12:35:44 PM PDT by
April Lexington
(Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
To: decimon
This can’t be true. The earth is only 10,000 years old. Dinasours were alive when Adam & Eve rode them out of the Garden of Eden. And, Raquel Welsh fought one while wearing a fur bikini - I’ve seen the video. These scientist are nuts.
To: decimon
but, but, but if Dinosaurs weren't killed by an Asteroid, that means Nuclear winter was also exaggerated and Ronald Reagan wasn't evil????
8 posted on
04/27/2009 12:42:37 PM PDT by
qam1
(There's been a huge party. All plates and the bottles are empty, all that's left is the bill to pay)
To: decimon
"Keller suggests that the massive volcanic eruptions at the Deccan Traps in India may be responsible for the extinction, releasing huge amounts of dust and gases that could have blocked out sunlight and brought about a significant greenhouse effect" Global warming without people????!
To: decimon
Ah, I remember the good old days when the mere mention of dinosaurs would result in the almost immediate posting of a picture of Helen Thomas....
12 posted on
04/27/2009 12:48:22 PM PDT by
April Lexington
(Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
To: decimon
Volcanic eruption or celestial impact! What’s the difference we can avoid either one by switching to solar or wind power!
13 posted on
04/27/2009 12:49:24 PM PDT by
ontap
(Just another backstabbing conservative)
To: decimon
Musta been the porcine flu.
14 posted on
04/27/2009 12:49:26 PM PDT by
theDentist
(qwerty ergo typo : i type, therefore i misspell.)
To: decimon; All
If a 112-mile crater didn’t lead to any extinctions AT ALL, not just dinosaurs (as this nutjob claims at the end of the article), then my name is Al Gore.
Maybe it didn’t kill the dinosaurs due to when it fell (if in fact it didn’t hit at 65 million years, which frankly is in doubt because of the statement saying it wouldn’t have killed any animal off), but something went extinct because of it.
This crater is huge! I have never heard anyone claim before a crater this size would not result in extinctions because frankly, that is a preposterous claim. The rock that hit was massive.
15 posted on
04/27/2009 12:51:36 PM PDT by
rwfromkansas
("Carve your name on hearts, not marble." - C.H. Spurgeon)
To: decimon
I knew it, I knew it...Dinosaurs were living 6000 years ago!
To: decimon
Keller suggests that the massive volcanic eruptions at the Deccan Traps in India may be responsible for the extinction, releasing huge amounts of dust and gases that could have blocked out sunlight and brought about a significant greenhouse effect. There have been some speculations that the shockwave propagating from the Chicxulub impact may have triggered volcanic eruptions on the other side of the world in India
23 posted on
04/27/2009 1:23:25 PM PDT by
PapaBear3625
(The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money -- Thatcher)
To: decimon
...no other large craters are known to have caused a significant extinction event.
No significant extinction events known to have been caused by other large craters? Interesting. Still, it's probably a good idea to keep a wary eye on those large craters...they could turn into killers at any moment.
To: decimon
This researcher has been on a crusade to disprove the asteroid impact theory and won’t share her evidence when asked so this should be viewed as a personal vendetta or something of the like.
To: decimon
300,000 years is still only the blink of an eye geologically speaking. So, the mass extinction took more than a few years, or a few hundred. It was still very rapid.
The impact theory will have to do until proof of something else is discovered.
28 posted on
04/27/2009 1:56:10 PM PDT by
JimRed
("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?" TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
To: decimon
29 posted on
04/27/2009 2:01:30 PM PDT by
diamond6
(Is SIDS preventable? www.Stopsidsnow.com)
To: decimon
>>However, a number of scientists have since disagreed with this interpretation.<<
They are just a bunch of deniers.
Haven’t they heard, “the debate is over”.
31 posted on
04/27/2009 2:04:07 PM PDT by
RobRoy
To: decimon
I thought they all died from smoking.
34 posted on
04/27/2009 2:47:34 PM PDT by
dfwgator
(1996 2006 2008 - Good Things Come in Threes)
To: decimon
The newest research, led by Gerta Keller of Princeton University in New Jersey, and Thierry Adatte of the University of Lausanne, Switzerland, uses evidence from Mexico to suggest that the Chicxulub impact predates the K-T boundary by as much as 300,000 years.Maybe they didn't die out right away, but started to decline with the decline in air quality after the asteroid strike.
To: decimon
Well, something got 'em, thank God.
The story here is, Gerta Kelly has been peddling this for years, has been wrong about it, and tries to push it through with press releases.
Bang goes that theory:
Dinosaur extinction ‘occurred 300,000 years AFTER asteroid impact’
dailymail.co.uk | April 27, 2009 | Daily Mail Reporter
Posted on 04/27/2009 4:35:51 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2239147/posts
44 posted on
04/27/2009 6:23:26 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson