I suspect you start drinking when you start and accelerate as the evening moves into night.
You really get quite ugly.
Why are you so anti-science? And why so vitrolic?
My suggestion is you lay off the sauce. I an sure when you are not so hammered you are a pretty nice person.
v1 is not being ugly nor vitrolic. He is right about the way most evos post and what with your accusations about him drinking while posting, just verifies what he said.
Disagreeing with the conclusions arrived at by scientists because of their ideology and philosophical base, is not being anti-science. Nor are there any *truths* in science. I guess you've missed coyoteman's little list-o-definitions.
"Fact" in science is a pretty fluid term, subject to the latest *scientific findings* and consensus.
You must not be reading what I am.
Disagreeing with the conclusions arrived at by scientists because of their ideology and philosophical base, is not being anti-science. Nor are there any *truths* in science. I guess you've missed coyoteman's little list-o-definitions.
I have been crystal clear that philosophy is one doman and science another. If you wish to be in the philosophical domain, then do not post science topics. Especially if you don't understand science.
"Fact" in science is a pretty fluid term, subject to the latest *scientific findings* and consensus.
There is no such thing as scientific consensus. And science's methodology does not change. The facts lead to where they lead. Sometimes entire sections of science change when new information comes to light. That is what makes science so cool. When science corrects itself, it isn't a "gotcha" for lay-people. It is just science operating normally.
Much irony on this thread.