I’ve talked with Stanton Friedman face to face a significant number of times.
He’s a real deal in a list of ways.
He’s also either consciously or deludedly deluded by the oligarchy and the critters in terms of the globalist agenda.
However his research and sharp analysis and reasoning are top flight in the field. He has shredded plenty of debunkers quite handily and humorously.
I have also suspected but never been able to verify that he likely has knowledge of very compact nuclear engines that we probably use to power the craft that we build after the pattern of the ET craft.
Evidently not all use such power modules. There is some indication, however, that even the pure ET craft—SOME of them—also use nuclear power units for the huge sums of electrical power needed.
I realize that the level of hands-on “proof” is insufficient for many folks who are hyper-objectivist in their sensibilities. I consider that a weakness on their part that can trap them in devastating pockets of ignorance in a wide variety of situations and contexts.
There really is 4,000 trace element cases that provides incredible tangible proof for those with any fair-minded or even high integrity at assessing such evidence.
Ditto for an increasing number of ‘other worldly’ implants now removed from abduction victims.
Folks who are incredulous at such quality evidence are, to me, showing their ignorance and their unreasonableness and their incapacity or unwillingness to fairly asses evidence. It’s sad and it’s laughable.
Ah...you are talking Faith, not Science. I shan’t try to dissuade you from your thoughts on this. You believe in it, you are welcome to it. Items of faith require no proof.
But, don’t try to pass it off as science, for there isn’t any.
Items of science require scientific proof.
He’s also either consciously or deludedly deluded by the oligarchy and the critters in terms of the globalist agenda.
However his research and sharp analysis and reasoning are top flight in the field.
If he cannot see through the phony GW and globalist b.s., how the heck can an open-minded person assume that his research/analysis will be accurate? One cannot, his analysis will be as accurate as his AGENDA will allow.