” [But] only in our period do we really have evidence. No, we’re not alone,”
That is a definite statement. He said we have evidence. Where is it? Maybe any type of evidence might be helpful, but, not has come forth yet.
I tend to agree with Stephen Hawking. In his “Universe in a Nutshell” he reasons about this and points out that, due to the extreme needs of an anthropological being (i.e. humans) that, while there may be other planets in the galaxy that supports life, it is very unlikely that intelligent life as we know it has formed anywhere else. Anthropological beings need very special situations to form. He does not make a definite statement yah or nay, just unlikely. I tend to agree with him.
I myself think that God had to start somewhere. And here were are!
As for actual sightings of ‘Flying Saucers’, I stand out in fields for hours every month looking at the sky (I am an amateur astronomer) and have never seen anything that I couldn’t explain by pointing binoculars or a telescope at and seeing what it was.
As for expert testimony, show me a real expert. The closest thing to one around now is Stanton Friedman and I find him less and less creditable as time goes.
I recommend “Universe in a Nutshell” even though it is an older work, Hawking does have a way with a phrase.
I’ve talked with Stanton Friedman face to face a significant number of times.
He’s a real deal in a list of ways.
He’s also either consciously or deludedly deluded by the oligarchy and the critters in terms of the globalist agenda.
However his research and sharp analysis and reasoning are top flight in the field. He has shredded plenty of debunkers quite handily and humorously.
I have also suspected but never been able to verify that he likely has knowledge of very compact nuclear engines that we probably use to power the craft that we build after the pattern of the ET craft.
Evidently not all use such power modules. There is some indication, however, that even the pure ET craft—SOME of them—also use nuclear power units for the huge sums of electrical power needed.
I realize that the level of hands-on “proof” is insufficient for many folks who are hyper-objectivist in their sensibilities. I consider that a weakness on their part that can trap them in devastating pockets of ignorance in a wide variety of situations and contexts.
There really is 4,000 trace element cases that provides incredible tangible proof for those with any fair-minded or even high integrity at assessing such evidence.
Ditto for an increasing number of ‘other worldly’ implants now removed from abduction victims.
Folks who are incredulous at such quality evidence are, to me, showing their ignorance and their unreasonableness and their incapacity or unwillingness to fairly asses evidence. It’s sad and it’s laughable.