Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: brytlea

>>I think you should say it’s evidence, not proof.

Perhaps. But from a falsifiable perspective, the lack of evidence of man and dino being contemporaries is pretty strong proof.


78 posted on 03/20/2009 8:24:45 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (Communism comes to America: 1/20/2009. Keep your powder dry, folks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: freedumb2003

It’s strong evidence. It’s hard to prove the theory (dinosaurs lived at the same time as early humans) or to disprove it, in fact. At least that is how we taught it. People like to toss around the word proof, but I think it muddies the waters here. You can disagree, and it’s semantics.


82 posted on 03/20/2009 9:01:33 AM PDT by brytlea (Jesus loves me, this I know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

To: freedumb2003; brytlea

bl: “I think you should say it’s evidence, not proof.”

fd: “Perhaps. But from a falsifiable perspective, the lack of evidence of man and dino being contemporaries is pretty strong proof.”

***********************************************************

Sheesh. How many times did coyoteman have to post his List-O-Definitions from the Cat-Tech website and you STILL didn’t get it?

There is no *proof* in science.

A Glossary of Frequently Misused or Misunderstood Physics Terms and Concepts.

http://spider.ipac.caltech.edu/staff/jarrett/LiU/resource/misused_glossary.html

“Proof. A term from logic and mathematics describing an argument from premise to conclusion using strictly logical principles. In mathematics, theorems or propositions are established by logical arguments from a set of axioms, the process of establishing a theorem being called a proof.

The colloquial meaning of ‘proof’ causes lots of problems in physics discussion and is best avoided. Since mathematics is such an important part of physics, the mathematician’s meaning of proof should be the only one we use. Also, we often ask students in upper level courses to do proofs of certain theorems of mathematical physics, and we are not asking for experimental demonstration!

So, in a laboratory report, we should not say ‘We proved Newton’s law.’ Rather say, ‘Today we demonstrated (or verified) the validity of Newton’s law in the particular case of…’”

Looks like you failed basic science again.

Tell you what, why don’t you go to school and take some science courses and get back to us when you understand what science is all about, eh?


101 posted on 01/01/2010 1:03:02 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson