Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Exclusive: Fined and Sanctioned for Seeking Truth about Obama's Eligibility?
FamilySecurityMatters.org ^ | March 17, 2009 | Margaret Calhoun Hemenway

Posted on 03/17/2009 10:58:03 AM PDT by NickyAitch

March 17, 2009 Exclusive: Fined and Sanctioned for Seeking Truth about Obama's Eligibility?

Margaret Calhoun Hemenway

John D. Hemenway, Esq., filed yesterday, Monday, March 16th, in U.S. District Court, his mandated reply by court order in the ongoing lawsuit to determine Barack Hussein Obama's (aka Barry Soetoro) eligibility to serve as President of the United States. The Judge, James Robertson, a Clinton appointee, ordered the response to his dismissal of the lawsuit, and threat to impose sanctions on Mr. Hemenway, to be submitted within a scant 11 days.

http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.2762/pub_detail.asp

(Excerpt) Read more at familysecuritymatters.org ...


TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: obama
Much attention has been given to President Obama's citizenship, and whether he meets the requirements of the presidency. Since Mr. Obama has hired legal teams to fend off this challenge - rather than producing documents to verify his natural-born citizenship - Americans should note that this is not a political issue, but rather an Article 2, Section 1 legal issue, thus making it an extremely important one. This issue is thus not the refuge of conspiracy theorists, but rather of people who care about the trampling of the legal structure set forth in the U.S. Constitution.

Read this important article that focuses on the legal conundrum and asks the question: "Mr. Obama, where is that spirit of transparency and openness when it comes to the raging dispute about your own birth and school records?"

1 posted on 03/17/2009 10:58:03 AM PDT by NickyAitch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NickyAitch

Unreal how Dem judges are covering for the Keyan-born marxists. Not like conservative judges are that much better either. The judiciary is totally corrupt.


2 posted on 03/17/2009 11:00:46 AM PDT by Frantzie (Boycott GE - they own NBC, MSNBC, CNBC & Universal. Boycott Disney - they own ABC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie
The judiciary is totally corrupt.

I agree.

3 posted on 03/17/2009 11:07:29 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Just being a "U.S. citizen" does not make one an American.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NickyAitch

It’s not really pertinent, but I’ll ask anyway. What is it with birthers and the whole “esquire” business?


4 posted on 03/17/2009 11:08:36 AM PDT by Melas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Melas
I won't answer your question because it would be a rather simple matter for you to look up the term "esquire" and learn of its traditional application to attorneys if you were actually curious about it.

However, I will note that your question points out not only your own laziness, but your ignorance as well.

5 posted on 03/17/2009 11:15:51 AM PDT by San Jacinto (gorebull warming -- the Socialists' Shortcut.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

I’ll second that.


6 posted on 03/17/2009 11:22:54 AM PDT by Two Kids' Dad (((( Two Kids' Dad ---- (T) - CA ** Join the "T" party ** ))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NickyAitch

We will not stop until we see the “real” birth certificate.............


7 posted on 03/17/2009 11:40:36 AM PDT by Stayfree (Help us expose the "real" birth certificate...Reward for Obama's Birth Certificate.com!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: San Jacinto

Great response!! Thank you!!


8 posted on 03/17/2009 12:01:28 PM PDT by Calif4Bush (STILL a 2012 Proud Moosehead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NickyAitch

What about his Social Security Number:

When you receive a Social Security number, the first three digits indicate the region from which it is issued. It is issued from the region where you are living when it is applied for.

According to public records, the first three digits of Obama’s Social Security number are 042. That is the designation for Connecticut. The region numbers for Hawaii are 575 and 576.

How then if he lived in Hawaii after his return from Indonesia and up until he went off to college, did he get a Social Security number issued out of Connecticut? He had to have had one when he applied to the Selective Service in 1980, prior to going off to college.


9 posted on 03/17/2009 12:55:14 PM PDT by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NickyAitch

Obama: the only US president to be sued (part I)
Source: Pravda
URL Source: http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/16-03-2009/107238-Obama_US_president-0
Published: Mar 17, 2009
Author: Mark S. McGrew
On February 9, 2009, a New Jersey attorney, Mr. Mario Apuzzo, filed a lawsuit on behalf of Plaintiffs, Charles F. Kerchner, Jr., Lowell T. Patterson, Darrell James LeNormand and Donald H. Nelson, Jr.

The lawsuit, Civil Action Number. 1:09 –cv-00253 was filed in United States District Court for the District of New Jersey.

You can see the actual case filing at Mr. Apuzzo’s website.

The defendants in this case are: Barrack Hussein Obama II, and Individually, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, United States of America, The United States Congress, The United States Senate, The United States House of Representatives, Richard B. Cheney (President of the US Senate, Presiding Officer of Joint Session of Congress, Vice President of the United States and Individually), Nancy Pelosi (Speaker of the House and Individually).

All of the defendants have been served with a copy of the complaint and have 60 days to respond to the complaint. Will they stand up like honest citizens and answer the complaint, or will they hide behind high priced lawyers like Obama has been doing?

Click for Full Text!


10 posted on 03/17/2009 1:45:28 PM PDT by FromLori (FromLori)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: San Jacinto

Oh come on, get real. I know a couple dozen lawyers, a couple judges, and numerous politicians who were attorneys in a previous life, and not one of them used the title, esquire.


11 posted on 03/17/2009 2:16:04 PM PDT by Melas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Melas
LOL! I can see you are still lazy and ignorant.

"...In the United States, however, "esquire" is most commonly assumed by lawyers in a professional capacity and has come to be associated by many Americans solely with the legal profession..."http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Esquire

12 posted on 03/17/2009 2:24:06 PM PDT by San Jacinto (gorebull warming -- the Socialists' Shortcut.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson