Posted on 03/12/2009 9:12:34 AM PDT by steve-b
Hate to say it in this instance, but . . . . I told you so.
When I wrote a column about how Bristol Palin remains a single mother--a baby mama--and had no legitimate reason to prolong getting married, several worshippers at the alter of St. Sarahmessiah told me I was wrong, that these two kiddie-parents (the Palin daughter and boytoy Levi Johnston) would be married this summer.
But, you see, I never believed they'd be married. In fact, I thought their engagement was a fiction put on by the Palin family to help win the Presidential election. And, unfortunately, I was right. As I noted, this kid had a very pretentious name ("Tripp Easton Mitchell Johston"), but not what was far more important--a father married to his mother....
But the issue I do care about is who will be the next Republican Presidential nominee. And how so-called social conservatives continue, with a straight face, to praise baby grandmama Sarah Palin (and chose her as their conservative of the year). She was not at home, when the pregnancy happened. She was busy blindly chasing her ambitions. And this is what happens when you have a working mother and a Mr. Mom, i.e., the Palins. Now, Todd Palin can proudly wear a new title, Mr. Grand-Mom....
The only one I feel sorry for here: this kid, who has the misfortune of being born to a single mother in a family that has far more pretensions than actual good values. Good luck, Tripp. You'll need it. For your sake, I wish it were otherwise.
Sorry, kid, but you're just not the luckiest bastard on earth. Or even in Alaska.
(Hmmm . . . am I still allowed to use the word, "bastard"?)...
(Excerpt) Read more at debbieschlussel.com ...
Again, if conservatives are going to actually assist liberals and the MSM in destroying a decent conservative candidate, then we will never win back the White House. Never.
That's one angry feline.
Well said.
I called this months ago, stating the MSM would continue with an Palin story they can so conservatives get 'Palin fatiigue'. Can't believe its already happening.
Let me just understand, because I may have a misperception about what you’re saying. Are you suggesting that we cannot discuss an article posted on the internet if it involves Palin in any negative way? Or, are you suggesting that we can only come and voice one opinion (ie in this case, who cares, it’s not news, go Sarh)?
Well, you have actually called other people stupid.
You apparently do not know what fornication means, nor
can you distinguish between the adjective “catty” and
the noun “caddy”.
But after all, why would words matter ?
Do you honestly think this article has an merit to be discussed?
Exactly. Well said.
Oh that’s right! You’re infallible, now aren’t you? My imperfect, unintelligent self isn’t worthy to read your words! I bow down to your hubris.
Oh keep trying. Your pseudo attempt at intellectual wit is amusing. Here, how about a few more spelling mistks... series, hugh, prolly...
We have a long wait for the unblemished and unmarred by life human being.
Well that pretty much sums up how I feel about this issue.
We don’t know the insides of this issue. I think the Palin’s can handle it.
Exactly.
Yes, trying to get me to understand that which is nonsensical in the first place IS futile.
Some of you here are acting as snobbish as Obama.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.