To: JoeProBono
The fossil footprint.Homo maybe but modern NO. Humans in flesh did not exist during this time period.
To: Just mythoughts
If they were advanced, you can bet they didn’t find the footprints in Washington.
6 posted on
02/26/2009 12:20:39 PM PST by
Oldpuppymax
(AGENDA OF THE LEFT EXPOSED)
To: Just mythoughts
Homo maybe but modern NO. Humans in flesh did not exist during this time period.
If there were indisputable means of dating a footprint that looked entirely like a modern human footprint at 1.5 millions years, you would devise some reason the results couldn't be accepted because of your preexisting assumptions of what could or could not have been making prints at that time.
22 posted on
02/26/2009 8:35:12 PM PST by
aruanan
To: Just mythoughts
[ummm, “Homo” means “Man”]
25 posted on
02/26/2009 9:52:12 PM PST by
null and void
(We are now in day 37 of our national holiday from reality.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson