Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: LucyT

Lucy T,
Regarding your post #71, my source is Ed Hale, Plains radio discussion during Tuesday night show, and my follow up phone call to Ed after the show. During Tuesday night show, Ed stated, on the air, that he had received a letter from Fox and not an injunction or court order.

With regard to your post # 72 and few other comments by other people on this thread, I do agree that Ed Hale is a bit rough on the edges. He too often, at least for my taste, wears his emotions on his sleeves and sometimes tends to embellish a little. He never tries to be politically correct and some may argue that is part of his charm.

I do not know Ed personally but I listen to Plains Radio, when I have time, to follow up on events surrounding Obama’s constitutional eligibility and state sovereignty effort.

I personally do not think the letter from Fox had anything to do with political views expressed at Plains Radio but rather related to dispute between Ed Hale and Ms. Adams also known as MommaE. I believe Berg’s letter to Ed Hale in which Mr. Berg lists Ed Hale’s on the air derogatory remakes about his client, MommaE, was most likely sent to Fox and Fox, justifiably, does not want any part of it. That is my feeling but I could be wrong.

I did not have time to tune in to Wednesday night show and do not know if Karen or Ed contacted Fox as the letter by Fox had instructed them.

I am really very disappointed to see so much infighting among radio personalities and between attorneys who have brought legal action questioning Obama‘s eligibility. It looks as though they enabled Obama to laugh all the way to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue and continue to laugh all the way to January 20, 2017. I find that sad.


84 posted on 02/19/2009 2:13:49 AM PST by ColdDecember (It is not just the BC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: ColdDecember; LucyT
I am really very disappointed to see so much infighting among radio personalities and between attorneys who have brought legal action questioning Obama‘s eligibility.

Very typical crank behavior. They're on the same side, and yet they fight over the smallest, insignificant detail. Each one of them thinks that their own version of the conspiracy theory is the only correct one, and anyone who disagrees with their version must be in on the conspiracy. This pattern comes up again, and again.

I find it very amusing. It's a lot like visiting a freak show at a circus.

85 posted on 02/19/2009 10:47:43 AM PST by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

To: ColdDecember
It only took two tastes of Hale's huckster behavior on the divorce papers for me to realize that he jerked a lot of people around on them, and is still jerking people around by providing false information.

I do not consider Hale to be on anyone's side but his own.

I read his nasty letter to Berg and wonder, where does he get off saying that Berg is just looking to get money when he has not authored a single, legal action against Obama, nor does he understand the great costs involved, nor has he gone on as many different radio and TV shows as possible to get the word out about Obama, and given the fact that Hale, not Berg, is the one scamming the public?

A lot of these talk radio jocks have incredibly inflated egos. They all think that they are the only show in town and go out of their way to bash others.

Make no mistake: This brouhaha between Hale and MommaE has nothing whatsoever to do with Obama's ineligibility issues. It is all about personality issues. So, please stop with this "Let's all get together on one side" mantra.

I say, don't waste your time on anyone who is not sincere about the issue of Obama's ineligibility.

97 posted on 02/21/2009 7:26:40 AM PST by Polarik ("A forgery created to prove a claim repudiates that claim")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson