Welllllllllllllllll,
There are several articles in I forget how many agricultural peer reviewed journals.
Those do talk about control samples as well as a fair list of measurements of various types.
But, hey—believe not, if you wish. There are at least some month(?s?) left on the capacity to do that fairly sanely.
I do hope some folks learn to avoid setting themselves up for a TYPE II error UNNECESSARLY and OVERWHELMINGLY.
Because TYPE II errors really ARE AS DEADLY as TYPE I errors.
I don’t really expect most naysayers hereon to respect the peer reviewed journal articles they screamed for, for so many years. I knew it was a falst demand to begin with. I knew they only respected their own brilliance, to begin with.
Nevertheless, such are available for those with any fair-mindedness available.
Cheers.
Fair enough. I am aware of the plant node deformation that has been found in some crop circles, and I think that warrants serious study. But in this case the video is a known hoax so it would be interesting to know what samples from that specific set of crop circles looked like.
BTW... what are the Type I and Type II errors you mentioned? Not sure that I’ve ever heard that terminology.