Posted on 02/13/2009 2:29:38 PM PST by Justaham
With her 14 progeny nowhere in sight, octuplet mother of the year Nadya Suleman took time out of her busy press schedule to get a federally subsidized manicure in Norwalk, Calif. on Friday.
Disgusting
I guess she thinks spending money on nails is more important than her medical bills taxpayers will have to flip for her. And also, more important than formula and food for her children......
What am I saying, my kids are grown and I have not had time for a manicure lately. Dang freepers and work get in the way everytime.
My kids are 16 and 12 and I still do not have time for this indulgence or others.
Very pathetic creature this Nadya is.
I’m a new grandmother. I had my acrylic nails removed a month before my grandson was born because I worried about the possibly of harming him with them. How can a mother with 8 premature newborns even think of stroking their little faces and taking care of them with fake nails?
You consider getting a manicure an indulgence?
Even nail polish can be toxic. Most normal moms will let their newborn suck on one of their fingers....but with clean hands and no polish.
While raising my kids YES. Just no time to worry about them nails. I groomed them.
That was your choice. Getting regular manicures aren’t an indulgence. Even busy moms need time to themselves just for the sake of sanity.
When the choice comes to you or your children, a good parent chooses the child. This was a indulgence for a mother of 14 children who has no money. But so typical of the Section 8 groups driving Escalades.
If Nadya says she can take care of 14 children, then with 6 she can do her own nails at home for now. But that is the responsible way. To pay for the children you bring into this world is not something Nadya plans so anything goes. As long as her parents and Fullerton college child care will watch them for free.
I agree w/both of you ladies. I ‘do’ my own natural nails, and when I had newborns, my nails were my last consideration. Infact, I wouldn’t even use polish, and would keep my nails cut/trimmed short so as not to scratch or nick my babies’ delicate skin.
She has preemies (their skin is so frail) and stroking them w/acrylic extentions? No way in my book.
You had children you needed to get away from? I have never felt that way in my life about my children.
Oh, don’t worry. Nadya obviously sees that Nadya is taken care of - on YOUR dime, and mine. You see, the government has a big old money machine that manufactures lots and lots of money just specially for the very special Nadya. She read that in her fairy tale book a long time ago. Her parents have spoiled her, and like most spoiled children, she is so rottenly spoiled that she stinks. . and that assures that there will be very little left over for the babies to ever be in any danger of being spoiled. I do feel sorry for the babies AND her poor mother and father as well.
One child at home with autism, one with ADHD, and one with delayed speech. I would be home with them and spending quality time. Nadya, “Everything I do revolves around my children.”
Is the home Nadya living in one of the bankruptcy homes? So she may have to move out?
Do you count them as a necessity?
Yes she can probably afford her own staff now. An NBC informant spiils that the network paid Suleman “upwards of $300,000” for the interview with Ann Curry.
http://www.jossip.com/how-much-nbc-paid-octuplet-mom-nadya-suleman-for-her-today-interview-20090206/
Yes I do. I work in an office environment.
Don’t blame her . . . she just wants to look goooooood for her next breeding cycle.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.