Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: the long march

I’m not a physicist.

consult Stanton Friedman et al

There have been a lot of pages published about such things.

I would suspect that it would depend on the . . . sophistication and degree of advancement of the technology producing the ionization etc. etc. etc.

My assumptions are that the public textbooks that might apply are decades out of date.


38 posted on 02/13/2009 12:42:25 PM PST by Quix (LEADRs SAY FRM 1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: Quix

It is not a matter of being a physicist. Stanton Friedman is not a compressible flow guy. He loves theoretical and he loves UFOs. Just because you want to do mind experiments about how something “might” occur when there is NO evidence that it can occur is good for R&D dollars but little else. Even returning craft to the earth’s atmosphere follow the rules of compressible flow ( mach cones, Fanning heating etc). Why be looking for zebras when you are being runover by horses?


46 posted on 02/13/2009 12:52:26 PM PST by the long march
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson