It is not a matter of being a physicist. Stanton Friedman is not a compressible flow guy. He loves theoretical and he loves UFOs. Just because you want to do mind experiments about how something “might” occur when there is NO evidence that it can occur is good for R&D dollars but little else. Even returning craft to the earth’s atmosphere follow the rules of compressible flow ( mach cones, Fanning heating etc). Why be looking for zebras when you are being runover by horses?
Time will tell.
I think . . . lots of things are not as they seem . . .
and . . . lots of things are not even as they are “known” to be.
Are you 100% certain that Stanton has never dealt with
compressible flow
in any of his work with plasmas etc. in reducing the size of atomic engines?
If so, how are you 100% certain?
I realize that the idea of compressing a plasma flow kind of boggles my layman’s mind.
I just think he may well have dealt with flow dynamics.